Code Climate

A Chrome extension for Code Climate

▶

Code Climate Chrome Extension: Quality & Coverage Feedback

Code Climate is a Chrome extension that provides an integrated approach to managing your programming quality and test coverage feedback. This tool allows programmers to see issues directly within GitHub’s user interface. It allows users to review coverage lines in diffs and files, and further enables users to add repositories and open tickets without disrupting their original workflow.

Download

Extension stats

By: https://codeclimate.com

Users: 10,000+

Rating: 3.98

(42)

Version: 735 (Last updated: 2023-07-10)

Creation date: 2020-06-16

Risk impact: Moderate risk impact

Risk likelihood:

Low risk likelihood

Manifest version: 3

Permissions:

cookies
storage

Host permissions:

https://github.com/*
https://codeclimate.com/*
https://api.codeclimate.com/*

Size: 3.37M

Email: he*****@codeclimate.com

URLs: Website

Ranking

# 8,712 ▲ 50

Other rankings

#2927 in Developer Tools ▲ 1 #17 in code keyword 23 ▼ 4

Other platforms

Code Wallet (v2.1.13)

4.60

(122) 10,379+

Not available on Firefox

Not available on Edge

Want to check extension ranking and stats more quickly for other Chrome extensions? Install Chrome-Stats extension to view Chrome-Stats data as you browse the Chrome Web Store.

Extension summary

Analyze keywords

Code quality and test coverage feedback without ever leaving GitHub.

See issues displayed directly inside GitHub’s UI. Review which lines are covered in diffs, files, and more. And add repos and open tickets without changing your workflow.

User reviews

These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews. Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate, spammy, or outdated.

Pros

Provides inline code coverage in GitHub pull requests
Useful for identifying untested parts of code
Saves time by providing coverage insights directly in GitHub
Restored permissions after user feedback
Has valuable functionality despite issues

Cons

Not reliable; often encounters rendering errors
Excessive required permissions, including access to browsing history
Only shows coverage for a limited number of files (20-25)
Performance issues that slow down the browser
Inconsistent functionality, often requiring re-authentication

Most mentioned

Only works with small PRs
Requires excessive permissions
Not very reliable
Performance issues
Rendering errors and UI problems

User reviews

Only works with small PRs

Dmytro Savochkin, 2023-10-11

It's nice to see test coverage directly in GitHub, but the extension itself is not very reliable. I often see rendering errors appear at the bottom of PR pages, and files with inline comments are often pushed far over to a single column making them totally unreadable.