Code Climate
A Chrome extension for Code Climate
Total ratings
3.98
(Rating count:
42)Review summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated. Pros
- Provides inline code coverage in GitHub pull requests
- Useful for identifying untested parts of code
- Saves time by providing coverage insights directly in GitHub
- Restored permissions after user feedback
- Has valuable functionality despite issues
Cons
- Not reliable; often encounters rendering errors
- Excessive required permissions, including access to browsing history
- Only shows coverage for a limited number of files (20-25)
- Performance issues that slow down the browser
- Inconsistent functionality, often requiring re-authentication
Most mentioned
- Only works with small PRs
- Requires excessive permissions
- Not very reliable
- Performance issues
- Rendering errors and UI problems
Upgrade to see all 53 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
2.20
All time rating average:
3.98
Upgrade to see all 53 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-31 |  | | en | It only works some of the time, and in the least useful way possible, in a github PR. This functionality should not need an extension, especially not one that requires such permissions |
| 2023-10-11 |  | | Only works with small PRs | |
| 2023-10-11 |  | | en | Only works with small PRs |
| 2023-05-08 |  | | It's nice to see test coverage directly in GitHub, but the extension itself is not very reliable. I often see rendering errors appear at the bottom of PR pages, and files with inline comments are often pushed far over to a single column making them totally unreadable. | |
| 2023-05-08 |  | | en | It's nice to see test coverage directly in GitHub, but the extension itself is not very reliable. I often see rendering errors appear at the bottom of PR pages, and files with inline comments are often pushed far over to a single column making them totally unreadable. |
| 2023-03-06 |  | | Not super reliable and it only shows 20 files of coverage even if there are more in the PR. This would not be a problem if there was a way around the limitation but this extension is the only way. | |
| 2022-03-25 |  | | en | Not super reliable and it only shows 20 files of coverage even if there are more in the PR. This would not be a problem if there was a way around the limitation but this extension is the only way. |
| 2022-10-24 | | | Recent changes require the extension access to your browsing history. This is not acceptable. Update: permissions have been restored as before. | |
| 2022-09-28 |  | | en | Recent changes require the extension access to your browsing history. This is not acceptable. Update: permissions have been restored as before. |
| 2022-09-29 | | | The extension is good, but this new permission to read browser history makes no sense and should not be required. |
Upgrade to see all 53 reviews