Chrome-Stats extension
Code Climate
A Chrome extension for Code Climate
Total ratings for Code Climate
3.91
(Rating count:
43)
User reviews summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated.
Pros
- Useful for seeing in-line code coverage and test coverage directly in GitHub
- Saves time by not having to run around different sites to understand code coverage changes
- Shows issues on each file in context, which is helpful for code review
Cons
- Unreliable at times with rendering errors and performance issues
- Only works with small PRs and shows a limited number of files
- New permissions required, specifically access to browser history, which users find excessive and unacceptable
Most mentioned
- Issues with permissions, particularly regarding browser history
- Performance problems, including slow operation and browser hang-ups
- Limited functionality with small PRs and a cap on the number of visible files
- Integration with Github, specifically how it injects CSS and affects PR views
- Unreliable functionality, with intermittent working state and rendering issues
Upgrade to see all 31 reviews
Recent reviews for Code Climate
Recent rating average:
2.00
All time rating average:
3.91
Upgrade to see all 31 reviews
Rating filters
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-31 |  |
|
en | It only works some of the time, and in the least useful way possible, in a github PR. This functionality should not need an extension, especially not one that requires such permissions |
| 2023-10-11 |  |
|
Only works with small PRs | |
| 2023-05-08 |  |
|
It's nice to see test coverage directly in GitHub, but the extension itself is not very reliable. I often see rendering errors appear at the bottom of PR pages, and files with inline comments are often pushed far over to a single column making them totally unreadable. | |
| 2023-03-06 |  |
|
Not super reliable and it only shows 20 files of coverage even if there are more in the PR. This would not be a problem if there was a way around the limitation but this extension is the only way. | |
| 2022-10-24 | |
|
Recent changes require the extension access to your browsing history. This is not acceptable. Update: permissions have been restored as before. | |
| 2022-09-29 | |
|
The extension is good, but this new permission to read browser history makes no sense and should not be required. | |
| 2022-09-28 |  |
|
en | The extension is good, but this new permission to read browser history makes no sense and should not be required. |
| 2022-09-28 |  |
|
Permission to access browser history is now required, which is excessive | |
| 2022-09-27 | |
|
Useful, but required permissions are excessive. | |
| 2022-02-09 |  |
|
Is it perfect? No, absolutely not. But it's a super helpful extension that can save you a lot of time running around different sites to understand why your code coverage went down. I do wonder though if a cleaner solution would be to improve the Code Climate site to actually have clear coverage change reports on their end. |
Upgrade to see all 31 reviews