PNCH: Boxing and Fitness

Name: PNCH: Boxing and Fitness
Rating: 4.2 (613 reviews)
Author: Alexander Baksheev

By: Alexander Baksheev App

Boxing-inspired workouts

Overview

Version:

1.2.1

Last updated: 2025-02-16

Ranking

#69,499 ▼ 43

Overall

Features & Capabilities

PNCH offers a personalized boxing-inspired fitness plan to help you reach your goals—from weight loss to body toning and conditioning—without bulky gym equipment.

With 100+ bodyweight exercises, HD videos, a built-in Voice Coach, and a flexible four-week plan, PNCH keeps you motivated. Subscriptions unlock full workouts and privacy details.

User Growth & Download Statistics

App Sports Education

By:

Alexander Baksheev

Rating:

4.20

(613)

Version:

1.2.1 Last updated: 2025-02-16

Version code:

856227020

Creation date:

2019-08-17

Compatible devices:

Size:

140.52MB

URLs:

Website ,Privacy policy

Full description:

Source:

Apple Apps Store

Data ingested on:

2026-08-10

Compare stats and ranking:

Ranking

# 69,499 ▼ 43

For Developers

Monetize with App Pass Boost with Extension Booster

Contact the developer

Chrome-Stats does not own this Apple app. Please use these information below to contact the Apple app developer.

Developed by:

Alexander Baksheev

Apple Apps Store

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/pnch-boxing-and-fitness/id1471117043

Website:

http://pnch.app

User Reviews

Reviews generally praise PNCH for effective, tough boxing/HIIT workouts at home and for motivating users to train. A frequent major gripe is the pricing model: an upfront paywall with unclear trial options, and concerns about value for money. A smaller subset also suggests upgrade needs or minor quality/UX improvements, but pricing dominates overall sentiment.

Pros

Workouts are effective, challenging, and help improve fitness and strength.
Workouts motivate users to start and stay consistent with training.
Home-based boxing/HIIT-style routines are well-received and seen as a flexible workout option.

Cons

Pricing model is an upfront paywall with unclear trial availability, leading to dissatisfaction across multiple reviews.
Perceived lack of transparency about pricing and the pay-to-use approach, with comments about money-focused motives in reviews.