The add-on fails when moving from 10.jpg and the previous image is 9.jpg instead of 09.jpg. The algorithm assumes there is a hole and goes all the way down to 00.jpg (That also doesn't exist). The algorithm should check first for an URL without leading zeroes before assuming there is a hole. you should also check if the same malfunction is present in NextPrev Page add-on too.

by Art of Walls, 2024-07-15

View all user reviews ›

Extension safety

Risk impact

Prev Page requires a few sensitive permissions. Exercise caution before installing.

Risk impact analysis details

Critical Allows access to all websites, posing a significant security risk as it can monitor and modify data from any visited site.

Risk likelihood

Prev Page is probably trust-worthy. Prefer other publishers if available. Exercise caution when installing this add-on.

Risk likelihood analysis details

High This extension has low user count. Unpopular extensions may not be stable or safe.
Low **** ********* *** ******* **** **** * ****** **** ***** ******** *** **** ****** ** ** ****** *** *****
Low **** ********* *** ***** **** **** * ****** **** ***** ********** *** **** ****** ** ** ****** *** *****
Good **** ********* *** **** **** *******

Upgrade to see full risk analysis details

Instantly check and monitor your browser extensions' risks and permissions with Extension Guard.