LUA Web IDE

Name: LUA Web IDE
Rating: 2.8 (5 reviews)
Author: juergenmarsch

A Code Editor for LUA on ESP8266

▶

LUA Web IDE is a Chrome-based Code Editor designed for LUA on ESP8266. It offers various features including source editing, blockly editing, JavaScript to LUA conversion, local project management, ESP8266 file handling, and testing screen for displaying values from ESP8266 boards.

Download

By: juergenmarsch

Users: 297

Rating: 2.80

(5)

Version: 0.1.7 (Last updated: 2015-04-30)

Creation date: 2015-04-30

Risk:

Permissions:

serial
videoCapture
{"fileSystem":["write","retainEntries","directory"]}
storage
http://*/
https://*/

Size: 1.20M

Full description: See detailed description

Source: Chrome Web Store

Updated: a day ago

Ranking

# 47,867 ▲ 1,993

Other rankings

#3931 in Developer Tools ▲ 11

User reviews

This is a very good IDE

Ranadheer Mutyalapati, 2024-09-12

It works at first, connects to my ESP. It will then run ONE single command. To get the send function to work again I have to disconnect and re-connect. ESP8266 Huzzah Breakout Board.

Russell Shedden, 2018-09-02

This suffers from much the same problems as the Espurino version that runs Javascript except that one at least works sometimes. This one is almost useless and just does not work at any speed. ESPlorer works ALL THE TIME with no problem at all.

Bernard Bout, 2016-06-10

View all user reviews

Extension safety

Risk impact

LUA Web IDE requires some sensitive permissions that could impact your browser and data security. Exercise caution before installing.

Risk impact analysis details

Critical Captures visible content, which may expose user data displayed on the screen, posing a security threat.
Critical ****** ****** ** *** ********* ****** * *********** ******** **** ** ** *** ******* *** ****** **** **** *** ******* *****
Low ******* ****** ** *** ********* ********

Risk likelihood

LUA Web IDE has earned a fairly good reputation and likely can be trusted.

Risk likelihood analysis details

High This extension has low user count. Unpopular extensions may not be stable or safe.
Medium **** ********* *** *** **** *******
Low **** ********* *** ******* **** **** * ****** **** ***** ******** *** **** ****** ** ** ****** *** *****
Low **** ********* *** ***** **** **** * ****** **** ***** ********** *** **** ****** ** ** ****** *** *****

Upgrade to see full risk analysis details