Reviews of Wikipedia

By: Wikimedia Foundation

List of user reviews and ratings for Wikipedia

Total ratings

4.31 (Rating count: 693,745)

Receive review notifications

Get notified when new reviews are posted so you can respond quickly.

See reviews on Google Play Store

View and respond to reviews directly on the store page.

Visit

Review summary

The app is broadly praised for its ease of use, clear UI, customization, and wealth of information. Users value its educational content and overall usefulness. A key concern is content integrity, with AI-generated material replacing human-edited articles in a couple of reviews. Occasional bugs and UI glitches are noted, such as image-caching quirks and location inaccuracies. Despite these issues, the app remains a popular knowledge source and is often described as simply awesome.

Pros

User-friendly interface that is easy to use and navigate, with many options.
Clear UI with strong customization, including the ability to tailor the home page.
Broad, informative content that makes Wikipedia a valuable learning resource.
Overall positive sentiment and enjoyment expressed by many users.

Cons

AI-generated content appearing in articles, undermining credibility and trust in human-edited Wikipedia entries.

Upgrade to see all 15,770 reviews

User Reviews

Recent rating average: 4.00

All time rating average: 4.31

Upgrade to see all 15,770 reviews

1% (129)

Date	Author	Comment
2026-07-11	Li*****	Good casual encyclopedia. Love it
Good casual encyclopedia. Love it
2026-07-10	Al*****	Excellent 👍
Excellent 👍
2026-07-10	RL*****	The brand new app looks like refried feces. I never thought Wiki would enshitify but here it is. A hand fed tiny little role of enlarged photos. The old app was soooo much more appealing. I guess UX/UI "engineers" gotta flex....poorly.
The brand new app looks like refried feces. I never thought Wiki would enshitify but here it is. A hand fed tiny little role of enlarged photos. The old app was soooo much more appealing. I guess UX/UI "engineers" gotta flex....poorly.