Listening Back Firefox

Listening Back

This extension plays a sound whenever a cookie is written, overwritten or deleted.

Features & Capabilities

Listening Back sonifies internet cookies in real time as you browse online. Every time a cookie is inserted onto your computer, deleted from your computer or overwritten a sound is triggered. Signature sounds have been designed for the most commonly browsed platforms, e.g. Google, Facebook, YouTube, Amazon and more. Via preferences an interface allows one to change the pitch and volume of the cookie data. By translating cookies into sound Listening Back provides an audible presence for hidden infrastructures that collect personal and identifying data by storing a file on one’s computer. Listening Back therefore functions to expose real-time digital surveillance and consequently the ways in which our everyday relationships to being surveilled have become normalised.

A Brief History of the Origin of Cookies. Named after the computer science term “magic cookie” when Netscape Communications programmer Lou Montulli had the idea of using cookies in web communications in June 1994.(1) At the time Netscape was developing an e-commerce application for North American telecommunications corporation MCI and cookies provided a means to reliably implement a virtual shopping cart.

Before Internet cookies were invented in 1994 the World Wide Web had no memory. In other words the Web was a stateless infrastructure. ‘Stateless’ is a computer engineering term used to describe the situation whereby every time a web site was visited there was no recall of previous visits, preferences, log in information or user ID. Without a state mechanism to store records of browsing activity, future developments such as shopping online would not have been possible. Online shopping without cookies would be analogous to using a vending machine as you could not buy more than one product at a time and there would have been no automated feature to remember your personal information. A stateless Web meant that every visit to a website was like the first and any commercial transaction would have to be handled from start to finish in a single session. The statelessness problem concerned the Netscape Enterprise Server Division, while working on a contract for a new shopping cart application for online stores. In 1994 Lou Montulli and John Giannandrea developed a working concept termed, ‘Persistent Client State HTTP Cookies.’ This solution called for each Web site's server to place a small file on each visitor's computer that would track what the visitor did at that site. Internet cookies enabled Web servers to keep track of users browsing activities thereby providing the Web with memory, and significantly for the first time, a protocol for online automated data collection. Cookies transformed the World Wide Web from a system of discontinuous visits to a culture of persistent connectivity.

The first use of cookies out of the lab in 1994 was to determine if visitors to the Netscape website had already visited the site. Montulli applied for a patent for the cookie technology in 1995 and support for cookies was integrated into Internet Explorer version 2 in October 1995. Netscape cookies led to the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (2), to work on a standard for state management on the Internet. The first proposed standard was Kritsol’s State Info which limited state information to a browser session. In contrast Netscape’s cookies had no requirement that cookies be destroyed at the end of a browser session, rather they could persist for many years. However the IETF eventually switched to the Netscape cookies’ specification largely because the Netscape version was a ubiquitous working model that had become a de facto standard. The IETF’s goal then shifted to developing a more precise standard for cookies than Netscape’s one page draft.

It was not until early 1996 that the public became aware of cookies. The Financial Times broke the story on February 12, 1996 with an article on cookies and privacy (Jackson 1996). This was followed by a story the next day in the United States, “Web Cookies May Be Spying on You” (Gomes, 1996). The article immediately drew attention to cookies and resulted in a great outcry due to the significant privacy implications.

It was also in February 1996 that the IETF identified third-party cookies as a considerable privacy threat. Normally, a cookie's domain attribute will match the domain that is shown in the web browser's address bar. This is called a first-party cookie. A third-party cookie however belongs to a domain different from the one shown in the address bar. This sort of cookie typically appears when web pages feature content from external websites, such as banner advertisements. Third party cookies can be used by online advertising companies to create detailed records of a person’s web browsing habits. The specification produced by the IETF in 1997 (RFC2109) specified that third-party cookies were either not allowed at all, or at least not enabled by default. At this time advertising companies were already using third-party cookies. Despite the IETF s standard, browsers still accept third party cookies by default to satisfy the advertising companies that rely on third party cookies.

Due to the rapid development cycle and emphasis on commerce Netscape’s cookies were introduced in four ways. Firstly, Netscape turned the feature on by default without notifying or asking the consent of users. Secondly, there was no notification mechanism to alert people when cookies were being placed on their computer. Users did not know that information about them was being saved. Third, the cookies technology was not transparent. Examining a cookies file provides no information about what is stored in the cookie file. Fourth, there was no documentation available that explained what cookies were and their privacy implications. Since it’s origins in the 1990’s cookies have become ubiquitous, fundamentally altering the nature of surfing the Web from being a relatively anonymous activity, to the kind of environment where records of one's transactions, movements and even desires could be stored, sorted, mined and sold.

(1) A Magic Cookie denotes a packet of data a program receives and sends back unchanged.

(2) IETF was the de facto Internet standards body

User Growth & Download Statistics

Manifest V2 Add-on
By:
Firefox user 14292001
Daily users:
9 1
Rating:
3.75
(4)
Version:
1.0.2 Last updated: 2019-12-17
Version code:
4925804
Creation date:
2018-09-17
Risk:
High risk impact Low risk likelihood
Permissions:
Size:
84.03KB
Email:
li*****@zoho.com
URLs:
Website
Full description:
See detailed description
Source:
Firefox Add-ons Store
Data ingested on:
2026-06-20
Compare stats and ranking:

Contact the developer

Chrome-Stats does not own this Firefox add-on. Please use these information below to contact the Firefox add-on developer.
Developed by:
Firefox user 14292001
Firefox Add-ons Store
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/listening-back/
Email:
li*****@zoho.com
Website:
http://jasmineguffond.com/

User Reviews

by 远离*****, 2025-04-15

by 敬念*****, 2025-03-10

by ge*****, 2024-07-17
View all user reviews ›

Is Listening Back Safe?

Risk impact
Risk impact measures the level of extra permissions an extension has access to. A low risk impact extension cannot do much harms, whereas a high risk impact extension can do a lot of damage like stealing your password, bypassing your security settings, and accessing your personal data. High risk impact extensions are not necessarily malicious. However, if they do turn malicious, they can be very harmful.

Listening Back requires some sensitive permissions that could impact your browser and data security. Exercise caution before installing.

Risk impact analysis details
  • Critical Grants access to browser tabs, which can be used to track user browsing habits and history, presenting a privacy concern.
  • Critical ****** ****** ** *** ********* ****** * *********** ******** **** ** ** *** ******* *** ****** **** **** *** ******* *****
Risk likelihood
Risk likelihood measures the probability that a Firefox add-on may turn malicious. This is determined by the publisher and the Firefox add-on reputation on Firefox Add-ons Store, the amount of time the Firefox add-on has been around, and other signals about the Firefox add-on. Our algorithms are not perfect, and are subject to change as we discover new ways to detect malicious extensions. We recommend that you always exercise caution when installing a Firefox add-on.

Listening Back has earned a fairly good reputation and likely can be trusted.

Risk likelihood analysis details
  • High This extension has low user count. Unpopular extensions may not be stable or safe.
  • Low **** ********* *** ******* **** **** * ****** **** ***** ******** *** **** ****** ** ** ****** *** *****
  • Low **** ********* *** ***** **** **** * ****** **** ***** ********** *** **** ****** ** ** ****** *** *****
  • Good **** ********* *** **** **** *******
Extension Guard
Extension Guard

Discover every extension in use, analyze risks, and enforce blocking policies with Extension Guard

Secure Your Browser
Upgrade to see full risk analysis details

Best Listening Back Alternatives

Here are some Firefox add-ons that are similar to Listening Back: