Trace GPT AI Detector by PlagiarismCheck.org
Check content, websites, and emails for AI presence with an accurate Trace GPT AI Detector by PlagiarismCheck.org
Total ratings
4.24
(Rating count:
25)Review summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated. Pros
- Helpful for checking essays and applicants' work
- Comprehensive and clear reports
- Easy to use as a Chrome extension
- Provides some form of protection against AI-generated content
Cons
- Generates false positives on original work
- Does not seem to accurately detect AI writing
- Some users experienced issues with virus blockers
Most mentioned
- Inaccurate detection leading to false positives
- Usefulness for educators and recruiters
- Ease of use as a Chrome extension
Upgrade to see all 47 reviews
Recent reviews
Recent rating average:
2.40
All time rating average:
4.24
Upgrade to see all 47 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-03 |  | | en | Had AI write two paragraphs, both with 0.00% AI likeliness rate. Seems like a complete waste of time for me while checking applications. Bad extension. |
| 2024-01-29 |  | | en | My virus blocker blocked it. |
| 2023-11-15 |  | | en | I don't know. I checked 3 writing samples that were completely written by me from start to finish and it said that it was over 60% likely AI. Do I write like a bot? Is it the way I use certain vocabulary words? I'm dissapointed. |
| 2023-10-26 |  | | I can't believe the level of false positive this thing generates. More worryingly, it seems that commentators here seem to think that this tool, and others like it, are the next best thing to sliced bread!!. Gave me a likelihood of AI generation on my own original work. The issue here, it would seem, is the amount of bias and training (or lack thereof) in the model, which makes it think that it's actually doing the job; and as a computer scientist and researcher, I know the challenges underlying even the thought of tools like these; and as an academic, whilst I find it useful to judge how much of the content a student submits is AI-generated, I find it questionable that the use of AI-supported tools should be an ethical issue, given that just about every automated decision making system out there uses AI and ML by default. | |
| 2023-10-26 |  | | en | I can't believe the level of false positive this thing generates. More worryingly, it seems that commentators here seem to think that this tool, and others like it, are the next best thing to sliced bread!!. Gave me a likelihood of AI generation on my own original work. The issue here, it would seem, is the amount of bias and training (or lack thereof) in the model, which makes it think that it's actually doing the job; and as a computer scientist and researcher, I know the challenges underlying even the thought of tools like these; and as an academic, whilst I find it useful to judge how much of the content a student submits is AI-generated, I find it questionable that the use of AI-supported tools should be an ethical issue, given that just about every automated decision making system out there uses AI and ML by default. |
| 2023-09-27 |  | | It tells me my own work is generated by and AI. Maybe I write like a robot. Or it just doesn't work | |
| 2023-09-27 |  | | en | It tells me my own work is generated by and AI. Maybe I write like a robot. Or it just doesn't work |
| 2023-08-01 |  | | I always check essays here. Chrome extension is very helpful, now I don’t have to switch in-between the apps. | |
| 2023-08-01 |  | | en | I always check essays here. Chrome extension is very helpful, now I don’t have to switch in-between the apps. |
| 2023-08-01 |  | | Peple sneak with ChatGPT, but this extension got me covered |
Upgrade to see all 47 reviews