Basketball AI: Coach

Name: Basketball AI: Coach
Rating: 4.8 (532 reviews)
Author: Joseph Goldberg

By: Joseph Goldberg

Train Smarter. Improve Fast.

Features & Capabilities

Train smarter with Swish AI, an AI-powered basketball coach that analyzes your gameplay, provides personalized drills, and highlights strengths and improvement areas. Discover your playstyle with comparisons to see how your attributes stack up across key skills.

Upload clips to receive detailed feedback, track progress over time, and unlock personalized training plans and a trophy-based system to celebrate milestones—your coach in your pocket. Requires an active subscription for full features.

User Growth & Download Statistics

App Sports AI Education

By:

Joseph Goldberg

Rating:

4.80

(532) 19 new ratings

Version:

4.2 Last updated: 2026-07-01

Version code:

887062131

Creation date:

2026-01-03

Compatible devices:

Size:

90.98MB

URLs:

Full description:

Source:

Apple Apps Store

Data ingested on:

2026-07-03

Compare stats and ranking:

Ranking

# 76,793 ▲ 581

For Developers

Monetize with App Pass Boost with Extension Booster

Contact the developer

Chrome-Stats does not own this Apple app. Please use these information below to contact the Apple app developer.

Developed by:

Joseph Goldberg

Apple Apps Store

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/basketball-ai-coach/id6756793268

User Reviews

Reviews consistently note improved skills and scoring, plus effective, coach-like drills and an overall positive experience. The main drawbacks are usability issues and concerns about the paid model and value for money.

Pros

Helps users improve basketball skills and on-court performance, with noticeable scoring gains
Drills are effective and resemble coaching content, helping users learn and apply drills
Overall positive experience and satisfaction; users feel the app elevates their game and is worth using

Cons

Technical issues and usability problems (progress being lost, drills generation issues, or app unusable after purchase)
Cost/paid model raises questions about value for money