Stable Diffusion:text to image

Name: Stable Diffusion:text to image
Rating: 4.5 (250 reviews)
Author: Daichi Kusano

By: Daichi Kusano App

ai generator 18,image art ai

Overview

Version:

1.1.4

Last updated: 2025-09-15

Features & Capabilities

Stable Diffusion: Text to Image is an AI-powered image generator that creates visuals automatically from text prompts. It supports anime and live-action styles, enabling you to generate unique artwork and design assets in seconds.

Use it to craft icons for social media, creative art, and design materials. How it works: enter a prompt, select a style, and generate high-quality images suitable for projects, posts, or concepts. Always review the app's terms of use before use.

User Growth & Download Statistics

App AI GenAI Design Photography Content

By:

Daichi Kusano

Rating:

4.50

(250) 0.10

Version:

1.1.4 Last updated: 2025-09-15

Version code:

878114848

Creation date:

2024-07-27

Compatible devices:

Size:

123.68MB

URLs:

Full description:

Source:

Apple Apps Store

Data ingested on:

2026-07-24

Compare stats and ranking:

Ranking

# 107,118 ▼ 659

Other rankings

#7 in text-to-image keyword 9 ▼ 1

For Developers

Monetize with App Pass Boost with Extension Booster

Contact the developer

Chrome-Stats does not own this Apple app. Please use these information below to contact the Apple app developer.

Developed by:

Daichi Kusano

Apple Apps Store

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/stable-diffusion-text-to-image/id6575382376

User Reviews

Most recurring points are billing/refund problems, prompts not being followed, and reliability issues. Reviewers report unexpected charges, full-trial payments, and refunds being denied, sometimes with no clear way to contact support. Several describe the app as ignoring prompts or returning only loosely related images, with editing attempts failing or taking long to respond. Performance complaints include slow responses, busy servers, or zero results after 24 hours. Some mention opaque cancellation instructions (even in Japanese). A small number note brief initial positives, but overall quality and trust appear devalued.

Pros

Occasional decent/semi-decent outputs at the start of use.
A few users report brief positive impressions (e.g., 'Great', 'Nice').
Some users achieved at least one usable image during trial.

Cons

Unanticipated charges and refunds problems, including full-trial charges and denial of refunds.
Prompts are often ignored or yield images only loosely related to the request.
Poor reliability: long response times, busy servers, or zero results after extended use.
Opaque customer support and unclear cancellation/refund policies (including instructions in Japanese).
Quality degrades after initial success: outputs become trash, with issues like green-tinted heads or missing requested details.