Lost Books of the Bible (New)

Name: Lost Books of the Bible (New)
Rating: 3.5 (6 reviews)
Author: Arsosa Network Inc.

By: Arsosa Network Inc.

Lost books, works offline.

Features & Capabilities

The "Lost Books of the Bible" refers to ancient religious writings that were not included in the canonical Bible. These texts, often apocryphal or pseudepigraphal, include books like the Gospel of Thomas, the Book of Enoch, and the Gospel of Mary. They provide insights into early Christian and Jewish thought but are not considered authoritative by mainstream Christian denominations. Scholars and historians study these texts to understand the diverse beliefs and practices in early religious communities.

WHY DOWNLOAD OUR FREE BIBLE APP?

The app works offline. No internet connection or WIFI required.
Listen to the bible with our audio/text to speech feature.
Bookmark, highlight, make notes and share bible verses.
Verse of the Day with push notification alert.
Include all chapters of the Lost Books of the bible.
Customize theme with different fonts and day/night mode feature.
Easy to use interface with simple and minimal design.

User Growth & Download Statistics

App

By:

Arsosa Network Inc.

Rating:

3.50

(6)

Version:

1.3 Last updated: 2025-07-30

Version code:

876795470

Creation date:

2024-08-29

Compatible devices:

Size:

29.50MB

URLs:

Website ,Privacy policy

Full description:

Source:

Apple Apps Store

Data ingested on:

2026-06-05

Compare stats and ranking:

Ranking

# 530,851 ▼ 4,234

For Developers

Monetize with App Pass Boost with Extension Booster

Contact the developer

Chrome-Stats does not own this Apple app. Please use these information below to contact the Apple app developer.

Developed by:

Arsosa Network Inc.

Apple Apps Store

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/lost-books-of-the-bible-new/id6505135299

Website:

https://www.appsoup.com/

User Reviews

There are random characters, especially numbers that do not make grammatical sense. The ads are such that a person who studies the Bible would find offensive. I’m of the opinion that speech to text was used. It is obvious a grammar check was not used.