Holdem Hand Strength

Name: Holdem Hand Strength
Rating: 1 (1 reviews)
Author: SHARKFACEPOKER LLC

By: SHARKFACEPOKER LLC App

Casino

Overview

Version:

1.4

Last updated: 2020-04-03

Ranking

#967,751 ▼ 2,822

Overall

Features & Capabilities

Starting hand strength calculator.

Holdem Hand Strength from SharkfacePoker LLC is a free Poker tool which helps you gain a greater insight into the game of Texas Holdem. This tool gives you the ability to understand how strong your starting hand is against all other hands and any random number of opponents along with useful stats that help you identify the overall probabilities of various final hands such as 3 of a kind, flush, etc.

Key Features

Rock-solid calculations tried and tested for accuracy
Easy-to-use interface optimized for the iPod, iPad and Retina displays yet still completely functional on older generation devices

User Growth & Download Statistics

App

By:

SHARKFACEPOKER LLC

Rating:

1.00

(1)

Version:

1.4 Last updated: 2020-04-03

Version code:

835311362

Creation date:

2012-02-26

Compatible devices:

Size:

13.32MB

URLs:

Full description:

Source:

Apple Apps Store

Data ingested on:

2026-09-06

Compare stats and ranking:

Ranking

# 967,751 ▼ 2,822

For Developers

Monetize with App Pass Boost with Extension Booster

Contact the developer

Chrome-Stats does not own this Apple app. Please use these information below to contact the Apple app developer.

Developed by:

SHARKFACEPOKER LLC

Apple Apps Store

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/holdem-hand-strength/id504139990

User Reviews

I can see the odds of a flush changing with the number of players drawing cards, but all things being equal, why should a 7-8 suited have different flush odds than 8-9 suited?

by JQ*****, 2013-06-11

Very nice little stats calculator. The previous reviiew said the flush and straight were incorrect for some hands The facebook page for the company stated that they used Monte Carlo simulations for the results and have now been rounded for straights and flushes to the nearest tenth. I see no problem with the results they are correct