The Augusta Chronicle Mobile

Name: The Augusta Chronicle Mobile
Rating: 4.1 (285 reviews)
Author: USA TODAY Co., Inc.

By: USA TODAY Co., Inc. App

Breaking News + eNewspaper

Overview

Version:

28.11.0

Last updated: 2026-07-24

Ranking

#95,737 ▲ 13

Overall

Features & Capabilities

From critically acclaimed storytelling to stunning photography and engaging videos, the Augusta Chronicle Mobile app brings the local news that matters to your community.

Key features include in-depth journalism, breaking news, sports coverage, weather alerts with real-time notifications, fast-loading browsing, offline reading, text size adjustments, night mode, and the ability to save favorites. It also includes the eNewspaper, plus access to USA TODAY and 200+ local papers.

User Growth & Download Statistics

App News & Magazines Content Photography

By:

USA TODAY Co., Inc.

Rating:

4.10

(285) 1 new ratings

Version:

28.11.0 Last updated: 2026-07-24

Version code:

888471187

Creation date:

2011-07-20

Compatible devices:

Size:

183.66MB

URLs:

Website ,Privacy policy

Full description:

Source:

Apple Apps Store

Data ingested on:

2026-09-23

Compare stats and ranking:

Ranking

# 95,737 ▲ 13

For Developers

Monetize with App Pass Boost with Extension Booster

Contact the developer

Chrome-Stats does not own this Apple app. Please use these information below to contact the Apple app developer.

Developed by:

USA TODAY Co., Inc.

Apple Apps Store

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/the-augusta-chronicle-mobile/id449134820

Website:

https://www.augustachronicle.com

User Reviews

Reviews are mixed. Many users praise the Augusta Chronicle Mobile’s digital edition for easy article selection, multiple ways to access content, offline reading, and overall strong appeal. However, a large number of reviews cite stability and performance issues, including crashes and slow/hard loading. Users also complain about a difficult new interface, poor navigation, screen-fit problems, intrusive ads, and missing front-page or page-by-page viewing. Some readers report content gaps (outdated local coverage) and subscription-related access problems. Overall sentiment is polarized: admired by some, disliked by others due to reliability and UX flaws.

Pros