Periodic Table: Chemistry 2026

Name: Periodic Table: Chemistry 2026
Rating: 4.8 (5303 reviews)
Author: Nikita Chernykh

By: Nikita Chernykh App

Chemistry in your phone!

Overview

Version:

4.0.34

Last updated: 2026-08-26

Ranking

#24,655 ▼ 28

Overall

Features & Capabilities

Periodic Table: Chemistry 2026 is a mobile, ad-free educational tool that makes chemistry visual and approachable. It features an interactive periodic table with filters and color themes, detailed element cards, 3300+ isotopes, a molar mass calculator, a concise chemistry dictionary, reactions and equations with clear conditions, and handy tools like favorites, notes, and comparisons.

Designed for students, university learners, teachers, chemists, and anyone curious about how the world works, it puts classroom-grade data into your pocket—with solubility charts, orbital models, graphs, and visual symmetry tools that help you understand matter from atom to universe.

User Growth & Download Statistics

App Education Data

By:

Nikita Chernykh

Rating:

4.80

(5,303) 5 new ratings

Version:

4.0.34 Last updated: 2026-08-26

Version code:

890294625

Creation date:

2019-02-09

Compatible devices:

Size:

128.33MB

URLs:

Website ,Privacy policy

Full description:

Source:

Apple Apps Store

Data ingested on:

2026-08-28

Compare stats and ranking:

Ranking

# 24,655 ▼ 28

For Developers

Monetize with App Pass Boost with Extension Booster

Contact the developer

Chrome-Stats does not own this Apple app. Please use these information below to contact the Apple app developer.

Developed by:

Nikita Chernykh

Apple Apps Store

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/periodic-table-chemistry-2026/id1451726577

Website:

https://chernykh.tech

User Reviews

Overall, the app is highly praised for breadth, educational value, and visuals. It’s a go-to resource for students, teachers, and professionals. Recurring concerns include incomplete element coverage, requests for augmented reality features, and licensing/pricing issues around lifetime subscriptions. Addressing these could improve completeness, engagement, and long-term value in classrooms and labs.

Pros

Extensive, detailed element data (discovery info, properties, valence shells) making it a solid reference for students and professionals.
Strong educational value for classrooms, exams, and science competitions.
Excellent visuals, including high-quality element images and 2D/3D Bohr models.
User-friendly interface that makes quick lookups easy and intuitive.
Widely useful for real-world chemistry tasks like grading and test preparation.

Cons

Incomplete element coverage (missing the latest elements and a full 118-element set).
Augmented reality features are missing or underdeveloped; users want AR support.
Pricing/licensing issues (lifetime subscription problems and price changes).

Recent reviews

Please don’t take this the wrong way, as I understand that you put time into developing the app. But I noticed just now that you seem to have delisted the single-purchase version of this app that you made and have now switched to a subscription service for the pro version on this app. I noticed this when I had accidentally deleted the single-payment pro version I had previously purchased from you and needed to go into my past apps to find it, as it’s no longer in the app store. I want to say this as gently as I can: nobody has any need for a subscription-based periodic table. The prices you are asking for are also absurd. You are charging for a periodic table app of middling quality (the UI/UX is rather poor), and this isn’t even something where a subscription model makes sense. There are too many free periodic tables (e.g., ptable.com) to justify wasting money on subscribing to a periodic table app. To others reading this; please save your money. This developer used to offer a pro version of this app for a one-time fee (<$10). I don’t remember the exact cost but it was not expensive. Now, returning to it, I see that subscribing to a pro version for even a month is more expensive than lifetime access used to be. This developer seems a bit greedy. I think you, dear reader, deserve better and can find better.

by Jo*****, 2026-07-29

When I saw neon was represented as orange, I thought “wow the graphic is accurate to the actual ionization color” but when I saw xenon its graphic was blue, so that was a disappointment.