Biennial Flight Review Prep

Name: Biennial Flight Review Prep
Rating: 4 (3 reviews)
Author: Squiggly Shark LLC

By: Squiggly Shark LLC App

BFR questions and answers

Overview

Version:

1.1

Last updated: 2019-07-15

Features & Capabilities

Questions to help you pass your flight review!

Biennial Flight Review Prep is your quick and easy way to simply pass the oral portion of your next BFR! Save money and time with a CFI by avoiding a lengthy oral exam. Biennial Flight Review Prep contains 100 questions ranging in topics from documentation, maintenance, weather minimums, aeronautical charts, aircraft performance, general FAR's and more. Go through all the questions at once or select a random sample of 10 or 30 to complete during your downtime. Review questions that you miss and retake the test using only the topics you don't understand. References are provided to sections in the FAR-AIM when appropriate.

User Growth & Download Statistics

App

By:

Squiggly Shark LLC

Rating:

4.00

(3)

Version:

1.1 Last updated: 2019-07-15

Version code:

832003753

Creation date:

2017-10-15

Compatible devices:

Size:

11.87MB

URLs:

Website ,Privacy policy

Full description:

Source:

Apple Apps Store

Data ingested on:

2026-08-07

Compare stats and ranking:

Ranking

# 589,644 ▲ 1,039

Other rankings

#84 in review keyword 18 ▲

For Developers

Monetize with App Pass Boost with Extension Booster

Contact the developer

Chrome-Stats does not own this Apple app. Please use these information below to contact the Apple app developer.

Developed by:

Squiggly Shark LLC

Apple Apps Store

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/biennial-flight-review-prep/id1296110221

Website:

http://www.squigglyshark.com

User Reviews

Upon downloading this application, the title changed from “Biennial” as it is named in the store, to “Biannual” as it is displayed on my phone. That immediately caused me to question whether the developers could help me prepare for the Biennial Flight Review. After trying a couple questions, I am guessing from the typos that the developers just re-typed questions and answers from another source. This could still be a useful tool, but the developers would need to put in more effort to convince me.