Pythagorea 60°

Name: Pythagorea 60°
Rating: 4.8 (172 reviews)
Author: HORIS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

By: HORIS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

Geometry on triangular grid

Features & Capabilities

Pythagorea 60° challenges your geometric intuition with over 300 construction problems drawn on a triangular grid. Work with straight lines, segments, and intersection points—no complex tools required. Explore 26 topics and a glossary of 70+ geometric terms, with a game‑center that tracks your best results and progress.

Ideal for learners at all levels, from beginners to Euclidea fans. The triangular grid hides surprises and deepens understanding of elementary geometry. Use the in‑app glossary to look up definitions on the fly, and enjoy a puzzle‑driven journey through lengths, angles, circles, symmetry, and more.

User Growth & Download Statistics

App Education Games

By:

HORIS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

Rating:

4.80

(172)

Version:

1.25 Last updated: 2020-02-27

Version code:

834860033

Creation date:

2015-11-11

Compatible devices:

Size:

88.39MB

URLs:

Full description:

Source:

Apple Apps Store

Data ingested on:

2026-06-07

Compare stats and ranking:

Ranking

# 119,313 ▲ 867

Other platforms

Pythagorea 60° (v2.11)

306,235 4.36

(1,746)

For Developers

Monetize with App Pass Boost with Extension Booster

Contact the developer

Chrome-Stats does not own this Apple app. Please use these information below to contact the Apple app developer.

Developed by:

HORIS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

Apple Apps Store

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/pythagorea-60/id1043064990

User Reviews

Challenging geometry puzzles, simple UI, pay if/what you want, no nags - what more could I ask for? Nit picking: the fixed 6x6 grid and the lack of zoom make some puzzles artificially difficult. Coin flip on whether skipping tedious puzzles should be allowed. But the elephant in the room is Euclidea. Not really fair to compare the two but many people will. I learned some geometry fundamentals from Euclidea. Some of the pyth60 puzzles are hard but I don’t think I learned anything. I passed up pyth60 for a long time, thinking the concept seemed a bit contrived, and IMO that instinct was correct. I worked through all the puzzles for a complete review. Some were just tedious - I used a calculator on several, and resorted to a spreadsheet on at least one centroid. So, challenging if you’re in the mood, and moderately rewarding.