Avaliações de HTTPS+ Checker

Por: Beu Add-on

Lista de avaliações e classificações de usuários para HTTPS+ Checker

Avaliações totais

3.57 (Contagem de classificação: 7)

Receba notificações de avaliação

Receba uma notificação quando novas avaliações forem publicadas para que você possa responder rapidamente.

Veja avaliações no Firefox Add-ons Store

Veja e responda às avaliações diretamente na página da loja.

Visita

Avaliações dos Usuários

Média de classificação recente: 3.70

Média de classificação de todos os tempos: 3.57

10% (1)

Data	Autor	Comentário
2025-04-14	天灭*****

2025-03-09	退出*****

2019-06-21	Fi*****	Sometimes it works, sometimes it does not for the same URL. Not stable at all. Plugin seems to work ok for getting the results, it is the site that sends the results that has the problems and needs to be updated.
Sometimes it works, sometimes it does not for the same URL. Not stable at all. Plugin seems to work ok for getting the results, it is the site that sends the results that has the problems and needs to be updated.
2019-01-19	De*****	To Aelisya and bigon, if you have Extension source viewer you can see (Firefox user 13857193)s code. This isn't spyware and does connects to securely... https://httpspluschecker.virtit.fr CODE: if (url.protocol === "http:" \|\| url.protocol === "https:") { console.log("onGot : " + API) var host = url.hostname; xhr.open('GET', API + host, false); xhr.send(); The addon does what it says and is safe!
To Aelisya and bigon, if you have Extension source viewer you can see (Firefox user 13857193)s code. This isn't spyware and does connects to securely... https://httpspluschecker.virtit.fr CODE: if (url.protocol === "http:" \|\| url.protocol === "https:") { console.log("onGot : " + API) var host = url.hostname; xhr.open('GET', API + host, false); xhr.send(); The addon does what it says and is safe!
2018-09-17	bi*****	Be aware that this module contacts an external non-https server to do the validation, this is a big no-no for me as this will lead to information being leaked.
Be aware that this module contacts an external non-https server to do the validation, this is a big no-no for me as this will lead to information being leaked.
2018-09-11	Fi*****	Where is the sources ?
Where is the sources ?
2018-08-20	Fi*****	Merci Bonne extension
Merci Bonne extension
2018-08-10	Fi*****

2018-07-28	su*****	Excellent addition! Unfortunately there are not enough websites on which all 4 squares green :)
Excellent addition! Unfortunately there are not enough websites on which all 4 squares green :)
2018-07-05	Bo*****	I've been looking for a replacement for CZ.NIX Labs' DNSSEC/TLSA Validator, which I still use in Cyberfox. For Firefox Quantum, I found Popineau's DNSSEC unsatisfactory at least until the promised DNS over HTTPS (DoH) service is fulfilled at which point I'll re-evaluate. But it's been three months since their last update... So, upon an icon click, HTTPS+ Checker queries a server (port 443) in France and presents a color coded result to the four fields. As such, and given its experimental nature, the ability, validity and security of this extension must rest upon the user's confidence in AMZG_Beu's expertise, methodology and strategy. And, of course, that of Mozilla's vetting. At this point I can't find reason to doubt that confidence and give five stars for effort, implementation and apparent efficacy. I look forward to continued development and success. Good luck and thank you.
I've been looking for a replacement for CZ.NIX Labs' DNSSEC/TLSA Validator, which I still use in Cyberfox. For Firefox Quantum, I found Popineau's DNSSEC unsatisfactory at least until the promised DNS over HTTPS (DoH) service is fulfilled at which point I'll re-evaluate. But it's been three months since their last update... So, upon an icon click, HTTPS+ Checker queries a server (port 443) in France and presents a color coded result to the four fields. As such, and given its experimental nature, the ability, validity and security of this extension must rest upon the user's confidence in AMZG_Beu's expertise, methodology and strategy. And, of course, that of Mozilla's vetting. At this point I can't find reason to doubt that confidence and give five stars for effort, implementation and apparent efficacy. I look forward to continued development and success. Good luck and thank you.