World of Card Games

bring back theprevious version this one is terrible hard to get on any table bubba38

It gets 1 star for the graphics. The graphics are about the best you'll find on line for card games. But, when I first started playing I was surprised there was only about 350 people playing the entire site. Then I discovered why ... Unfortunately, the hands dealt are NEVER anything like dealing real cards. I spent an hour each day for a week on each of the following games, examining the hands dealt, and here is what I discovered: 1. Hearts: often dealt Qs with only 1 spade for cover. Often dealt only 1 or 2 spades and passed the Q. Often dealt long hearts, but only 1 other player has hearts. In short, a good player should win about 25% of the time. A great player should win more. I'm a reasonable player. I played 21 games and won 1. Win rate: 4.7% ... go figure. 2. Spades: OMG ... every game, I was dealt at least 1 hand that was a nil, except for the Q. This seems to be the norm. Every game it seemed my partner and I were dealt 1 or 2 trick hands while the opposition was dealt 3-5 trick hands ... hmmmm. Also, opponents were often short suited with 0-1 cards in a suit I was high on ... meaning the A and K were quickly trumped by the opposition. Partners are random. I came across a handful who would throw the game as soon as they were dealt a bad hand. Next hand, they would bet nil or 13 and, of course, fail the bid. Again, unrealistic hands. The game play is making players angry. Considering you can't really pick your partner, I think a good player should win 40-45% and a great player should be winning around 55-60%. I played 24 game. I won 5, or 20%. 3. Euchre: usually a great game. uses only the cards 9 - A. Again, bad hands dealt all week. Most hands were Q or K high with 2 or 3 9's and 10's. Opponents often flopped a J while my partner and I would flop a 9 or 10. I would have thought our team would win about 45%, but after playing 40 games I had only won 9 or 23%. I was only playing ranked games with humans. I have a feeling there are two things going on. 1. A certain group is always getting good cards. Could this be because they pay or donate? I could find a place to do this, so I'm not sure. But I often played the same players and they usually had great cards, every hand. 2. It's abundantly clear that with Spades, a number of people are cheating. They're in contact over Skype or screen sharing or have two accounts and are playing two devices at once. I guess that's how some people get their kicks. Pity this is such a small and privately run site. If it was better managed, the cards were fairer, etc. it could have been great.

Mary is idiot . Mary is an idiot.