Chrome-Stats extension
NoScript
Maximum protection for your browser: NoScript allows active content only for trusted domains of your choice to prevent exploitation.
Total ratings for NoScript
4.11
(Rating count:
205)
User reviews summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated.
Pros
- Effective at blocking scripts and trackers
- Allows for fine-grained control of permissions for each website
- Can be easily toggled on and off as needed
- Works well with other ad and tracker blockers
Cons
- Can be tedious to constantly manage permissions for each website
- Some users experience issues with saving new rules to the database
- Interface changes have been poorly received by some users
- May block necessary scripts and cause website functionality issues
Most mentioned
- Effective at blocking scripts and trackers
- Can be tedious to constantly manage permissions for each website
- Saves new rules to the database
- Interface changes
Upgrade to see all 177 reviews
Recent reviews for NoScript
Recent rating average:
3.70
All time rating average:
4.11
Upgrade to see all 177 reviews
Rating filters
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-29 |  |
|
en | Easily the most practical way to implement a whitelist-only approach to web JavaScript. |
| 2024-04-12 |  |
|
ru | чутка перебарщивает с блокировкой скриптов. В остальном не знаю |
| 2024-04-07 |  |
|
en | How to change the language of the extension or option/setting page? |
| 2024-04-07 |  |
|
en | this breaks collapsing comments in reddit, so dumb.... tested it by enabling it, couldn't collapse comments. disable it and I can collapse comments as normally... |
| 2024-03-23 |  |
|
en | I've been using it for years.... can't do without it now. I was recently reminded how much junk in some websites after I had to reinstall my OS and a new Chrome browser. After a few weeks I couldn't take it..... installed NoScript again. |
| 2024-02-18 |  |
|
de | I'm using it on work and private. Is a must have. Also blocks cookie banners. Ich benutze es auf Arbeit als auch Privat. Es ist ein "Must Have". Blockt auch Cookie Banner. (Genauso wie Zwangsbanner die entweder Cookies erlauben wollen oder ein Abo dir andrehen wollen) |
| 2024-02-06 |  |
|
fr | Le doublement de la taille du pictogramme de logo est super agaçant. C'était beaucoup mieux avant. Avant, on savait si on avait ouvert des droits à un site, on n'était pas obligé sans cesse de cliquer sur Noscript. Maintenant, il faut rafraichir sans cesse les sites et cliquer plusieurs fois sur noscript, c'est une horreur! On dirait que le développeur a découvert qu'on pouvait augmenter la taille du logo de l'extension dans le navigateur au-delà du raisonnable. Je ne dit pas "bravo" ! Je dit "BRAVE", car, pour l'instant, ce phénomène a lieu surtout dans le navigateur Brave. |
| 2024-01-11 |  |
|
en | Seemed to be working fine till a couple of days ago, and I am used to having to "temp trust" a lot of the sites I visit daily or selectively trust what I need to in order to make them functional. I have not figured out how to make those specific permissions persist across sessions, if that is even possible. It would however be very useful. It started blocking every page of my search engine which I recently changed to duckduckgo, and I'm looking for a way to load new search/home pages that doesn't automatically block and load the non-js version every single time. Advice on either of the two points above appreciated. Good ad-on I have used for a long time, but maybe I will just have to revert my default search page to Google and continue reallowing the same temp permissions every time I open a new tab. Can't see another obvious option to make those permanent, but I would hope that option would be there somwhere? |
| 2024-01-08 |  |
|
de | Without Noscript browsing is a torture. Ohne Noscript ist das Browsen eine Qual. Top! |
| 2024-01-07 |  |
|
en | It's great! It does what it says, is FOSS, and is simple to use. I'm removing: - a star because it works only by blocking based on script source. Today, most websites rely on CDNs that often create non-persistent links for their content (e.g. scripts) which means that a script you allow/block might not work in 1 week, e.g. "1603811301.cdn77..." - a second star because cross-site scripts (notably tracking ones like google, google tag manager) aren't block-able unless you also want to break those pages completely. Maybe it's done with "cross-tab identity leak protection" in the advanced settings? Not clear how it works if you navigate across sites without opening a new tab though. I've been finding myself "temporarily" disabling it multiple times a day, and it has grown tiring. Per-script blocking is great, but it would be nice if there the ability to also specify rules per site, and using wildcards |
Upgrade to see all 177 reviews