Siteimprove Accessibility Checker
Jumpstart your web accessibility efforts directly in Chrome.
Total ratings
3.29
(Rating count:
21)Review summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated. Pros
- Easy to use and intuitive interface
- Useful for quick accessibility checks
- Readable and clear reporting results
- Helps optimize sites according to WCAG norms
- Good for UX designers and web developers
Cons
- Slower performance compared to previous version
- Lacks sidebar functionality that was present in version 1
- Inconsistent error detection compared to older versions
- User interface experience has worsened in latest version
- Requires rebuilding settings for each use instead of retaining them
Most mentioned
- Version 1 was better than version 2
- Users experienced frustration with the new interface
- Slow loading of results causing user drop-off
- Concerns about missing obvious accessibility errors
- Desire for a sidebar option was frequently expressed
Upgrade to see all 29 reviews
Recent reviews
Recent rating average:
2.80
All time rating average:
3.29
Upgrade to see all 29 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-02 |  | | en | Super easy, intuitive and organized! |
| 2024-03-20 |  | | en | I have used it on a few sites today, and found it easy to use and very useful. I only wanted to check contrast, and now found a few other issues as well. Great. |
| 2023-12-11 |  | | en | I'm using this extension, especially for my Scandinavian customers and it is doing its job nicely. The results in report are readable and clear. |
| 2023-05-15 |  | | Antes aportaba información de calidad al hacer la revisión y ahora la experiencia usuaria con la interfaz de la extensión al activarla es horrible. ¿Qué sucedió en esta nueva versión? Se fue eliminada de mis herramientas de revisión de accesibilidad. Fuiste bueno Siteimprove. | |
| 2023-05-15 |  | | es | Antes aportaba información de calidad al hacer la revisión y ahora la experiencia usuaria con la interfaz de la extensión al activarla es horrible. ¿Qué sucedió en esta nueva versión? Se fue eliminada de mis herramientas de revisión de accesibilidad. Fuiste bueno Siteimprove. |
| 2023-04-16 |  | | V1 was good. This version does not work well, and I don't use it because the errors do not load for me. I only see the Spinner which does not stop. I quit after 40 seconds.. I with they would go back to version 1 so I can use this again, but for now I'll pass. | |
| 2023-04-16 |  | | en | V1 was good. This version does not work well, and I don't use it because the errors do not load for me. I only see the Spinner which does not stop. I quit after 40 seconds.. I with they would go back to version 1 so I can use this again, but for now I'll pass. |
| 2023-01-09 | | | I really liked v1.x but I have noticed that v2 has obvious errors and things it is not finding in pages. It is beyond the rules being refined in this version. One example that made me take notice was a page that had dark grey text on a darker grey background that was obviously a contrast fail, followed by a dark blue "Read more" link that also was an obvious fail. The extension only called out the grey on grey and didn't seem to notice the blue on grey fail in an anchor adjacent to the grey text for any issues. When manually checked the contrast was below the 4.5 ratio so failed AA and AAA contrast guidelines, possibly also AA and AAA Link Purpose. Finding these errors in the extension has shown me it is not as reliable as the previous version at finding issues. Be careful if you are using it to scan your site as it could be missing obvious fails. | |
| 2023-01-09 |  | | en | I really liked v1.x but I have noticed that v2 has obvious errors and things it is not finding in pages. It is beyond the rules being refined in this version. One example that made me take notice was a page that had dark grey text on a darker grey background that was obviously a contrast fail, followed by a dark blue "Read more" link that also was an obvious fail. The extension only called out the grey on grey and didn't seem to notice the blue on grey fail in an anchor adjacent to the grey text for any issues. When manually checked the contrast was below the 4.5 ratio so failed AA and AAA contrast guidelines, possibly also AA and AAA Link Purpose. Finding these errors in the extension has shown me it is not as reliable as the previous version at finding issues. Be careful if you are using it to scan your site as it could be missing obvious fails. |
| 2022-08-22 | | | It doesn't give you the full picture. |
Upgrade to see all 29 reviews