Reviews of Supermocks

By: SuperMocks

List of user reviews and ratings for Supermocks

Total ratings

3.89 (Rating count: 4,091)

Receive review notifications

Get notified when new reviews are posted so you can respond quickly.

See reviews on Google Play Store

View and respond to reviews directly on the store page.

Visit

Review summary

Users generally praise the quality and relevance of the test content and detailed analysis features. However, the app suffers from significant performance issues including slow loading times and technical glitches that affect usability. The poor user interface, unfriendly navigation, and bilingual format are frequently criticized, along with missing functionalities such as re-attempt options. These issues combined cause frustration, making the app less effective for smooth exam preparation despite having good content.

Pros

Content quality is good and relevant for exams like SSC CGL Tier 1 and 2.
The test series includes previous years' questions which helps in exam preparation.
Video solutions and detailed analysis of test questions are helpful to users.
The analysis feature showing time spent per question is appreciated by users.

Cons

App is very slow and laggy during mock tests, taking several seconds to load next or previous questions.
User interface and user experience are poor, with difficult navigation and lack of full-screen mock test view.
Technical issues such as questions or options not appearing properly, bookmarks not saving or showing completely, and math processing errors in solutions.
Bilingual question and solution format causes distraction and makes scrolling cumbersome.
Lack of important features like re-attempt mode and language selection in exam mode.

Upgrade to see all 4 reviews

User Reviews

Recent rating average: 1.40

All time rating average: 3.89

Upgrade to see all 4 reviews

250% (10)

Date	Author	Comment
2023-06-30	Sa*****	While the quality of the content is undoubtedly great, the UI and UX of the app is terrible to say the least. Every single aspect of the app needs to be worked upon. We can't swipe to go the previous or next question like we can in TestBook. Navigation within the mock is tedious. The bilingual format of the question is annoying and causes distraction. The quality of images used in image-based questions are so bad that they are barely visible. Navigating through the app isn't fluid either.
While the quality of the content is undoubtedly great, the UI and UX of the app is terrible to say the least. Every single aspect of the app needs to be worked upon. We can't swipe to go the previous or next question like we can in TestBook. Navigation within the mock is tedious. The bilingual format of the question is annoying and causes distraction. The quality of images used in image-based questions are so bad that they are barely visible. Navigating through the app isn't fluid either.
2023-05-19	He*****	When u going to compare with contant then it's good . But solution. Picture quality. & Most important. Question & solution both are in two langauge... & It's too much time taken. To scroll down & up. In exam hall thers is option to choose langauge. So it is also irrelevant
When u going to compare with contant then it's good . But solution. Picture quality. & Most important. Question & solution both are in two langauge... & It's too much time taken. To scroll down & up. In exam hall thers is option to choose langauge. So it is also irrelevant