Reviews of Resistor Scanner

By: MhTechDev

List of user reviews and ratings for Resistor Scanner

Total ratings

2.58 (Rating count: 2,431)

Receive review notifications

Get notified when new reviews are posted so you can respond quickly.

See reviews on Google Play Store

View and respond to reviews directly on the store page.

Visit

Review summary

The app has a promising idea and can aid colorblind users with resistor value identification, aided by zoom/exposure controls and batch readings. However, reliability is a major drawback: frequent crashes, inconsistent results, and camera/lighting sensitivity (glare, white balance) lead to misread colors. Calibration and stability improvements are needed for practical use across devices and environments.

Pros

Helpful identification of resistor values, especially useful for colorblind users.
Zoom and exposure controls help readability and accuracy when lighting is good.
Can read multiple resistors at once and show values for all.
Strong concept and generally useful/relatively accurate in favorable conditions.

Cons

Frequent crashes and instability; sometimes won't run at all.
Highly lighting-dependent; glare, flash glare, and white balance issues degrade results.
Colors detected incorrectly (e.g., brown read as black) and no calibration.
Results vary across devices/backgrounds; inconsistent across scenarios.
Background and lighting requirements make it unreliable in typical conditions.

Upgrade to see all 98 reviews

User Reviews

Recent rating average: 2.70

All time rating average: 2.58

Upgrade to see all 98 reviews

33% (32)

Date	Author	Comment
2026-03-31	Já*****	This is an amazing idea but sadly it does not display correct values, gave it a few tries on a black non-reflective background, but in it's current form it's really unreliable. 2 stars for the idea and work the author put in. I'd LOVE to see it work as intended. Keep up the good work :)
This is an amazing idea but sadly it does not display correct values, gave it a few tries on a black non-reflective background, but in it's current form it's really unreliable. 2 stars for the idea and work the author put in. I'd LOVE to see it work as intended. Keep up the good work :)
2026-03-19	As*****	good app
good app
2026-02-15	Co*****	Overall it seems to work but takes very specific lighting. using an S22+ the flash creates glare that confuses it. a sheet of black EVA foam, construction paper or felt reduces the glare and improves the contrast. link to upgrade and remove ads would not work. Just got it so I don't yet know about long term. 100ohm vs 220ohm detection worked mostly if the light was good and the zoom was larger. The more focused zoom the better so far. that makes sense as it has more pixels to work with
Overall it seems to work but takes very specific lighting. using an S22+ the flash creates glare that confuses it. a sheet of black EVA foam, construction paper or felt reduces the glare and improves the contrast. link to upgrade and remove ads would not work. Just got it so I don't yet know about long term. 100ohm vs 220ohm detection worked mostly if the light was good and the zoom was larger. The more focused zoom the better so far. that makes sense as it has more pixels to work with