Reviews of Learn Mechanical Engineering

By: CODE WORLD App

List of user reviews and ratings for Learn Mechanical Engineering

Total ratings

4.56 (Rating count: 3,623)

Receive review notifications

Get notified when new reviews are posted so you can respond quickly.

See reviews on Google Play Store

View and respond to reviews directly on the store page.

Visit

Review summary

User reviews broadly praise Learn Mechanical Engineering as a helpful, beginner-friendly tool for learning, revising concepts, and exam preparation. It’s described as easy to use, engaging, and motivating, with many users expressing positive sentiment and intent to upgrade to the paid version. Some caveats appear in a few reviews regarding content accuracy and a minor usability issue, but these are not dominant. Overall, the app is seen as a valuable study companion for mechanical engineering students.

Pros

Very helpful for learning and revising mechanical engineering concepts.
Easy to use and helps users achieve study goals.
Engaging and motivating; learning feels enjoyable.
Strong resource for beginners, especially for those starting out in mechanical engineering.
Useful for exam preparation and study guidance; acts as a guidepost for aspirants.

Cons

Upgrade to see all 86 reviews

User Reviews

Recent rating average: 3.90

All time rating average: 4.56

Upgrade to see all 86 reviews

12% (10)

Date	Author	Comment
2026-07-06	Jo*****	Super-duper
Super-duper
2026-06-28	Da*****	hangs on downloading its content
hangs on downloading its content
2026-06-28	Sa*****	👍
👍
2026-06-20	Gr*****	This app is helpful to anyone who want to pursue machenical engineering
This app is helpful to anyone who want to pursue machenical engineering
2026-06-02	Ad*****	nice application
nice application
2026-05-31	EN*****	is so helpful
is so helpful
2026-04-26	Fo*****	good 👍
good 👍
2026-04-19	ZA*****	so good
so good
2026-04-17	Du*****	very good
very good
2026-03-23	Sa*****	I'm questioning the validity of the information. It uses 'f' for acceleration in the Force equation instead of F = ma and it says Pgauge = Pabs + Patm, but the formula is actually Pgauge = Pabs - Patm. Or maybe they meant to type Pabs = Pgauge + Patm? Either way these are kinda crucial differences if you're wanting to learn to engineer things.
I'm questioning the validity of the information. It uses 'f' for acceleration in the Force equation instead of F = ma and it says Pgauge = Pabs + Patm, but the formula is actually Pgauge = Pabs - Patm. Or maybe they meant to type Pabs = Pgauge + Patm? Either way these are kinda crucial differences if you're wanting to learn to engineer things.