Reviews of Chess Opening Blunders

By: Chess King

List of user reviews and ratings for Chess Opening Blunders

Total ratings

4.41 (Rating count: 8,425)

Receive review notifications

Get notified when new reviews are posted so you can respond quickly.

See reviews on Google Play Store

View and respond to reviews directly on the store page.

Visit

Review summary

Overall, users praise Chess Opening Blunders for its strong, varied puzzles that sharpen tactical play and its replay/analysis features, plus real-player annotated lines and a focus on reducing opening blunders. Many reviewers find it unique and preferable to other puzzle apps, and several report noticeable rating improvements. However, several consistent complaints emerge: the difficulty is uneven, with some puzzles far too hard for average players and others too easy; the opening-theory content is deeper than the branding; the interface can feel clunky; and some puzzles lack explanations. Users want more guidance and more content.

Pros

High-quality, varied puzzles and exercises that boost tactical skills.
Replayable games with built-in analysis and multiple annotated lines by real players.
Unique app for opening/blunder training; praised as better than some alternatives.
Helps reduce opening blunders and improve opening play.
Large set of puzzles; users want even more content.

Cons

Puzzles can be too hard or too easy; difficulty is inconsistent and not suited for all players.
Opening theory depth is excessive; puzzles start late in the game, not aligned with the opening-blunders focus.
Interface feels clunky or not polished.
Some puzzles lack explanations or hints, leaving players guessing.
Difficulty ratings are inconsistent (some high-rated puzzles are very hard, others easy).

Upgrade to see all 157 reviews

User Reviews

Recent rating average: 4.80

All time rating average: 4.41

Upgrade to see all 157 reviews

4% (7)

Date	Author	Comment
2026-03-14	Ma*****	Замечательная программа
Замечательная программа
2025-11-16	An*****	loved it xoxo
loved it xoxo
2025-10-25	Bu*****	lacks explanation but interesting
lacks explanation but interesting