Arduino Tutorials

Name: Arduino Tutorials
Rating: 3.724138 (919 reviews)
Author: CoderBro

作者： CoderBro

真棒教程和使用的Arduino微控制器的项目！

功能与功能

学习编程和使用的Arduino微控制器，这个免费的教程中构建创新Arduino的项目。与乌诺，兆丰，纳米等建设，有了这个免费的Arduino教程。

使用本教程学习的Arduino编程，条件/循环，输入/输出，其他有用的功能和Arduino的代码的语法。

请尝试在本教程中解释了各个项目！

研究一个Arduino单片机等数字引脚，模拟引脚，USB端口，电源插孔，处理器等使用该免费教程的各种部件。

学习核心的Arduino的功能，如digitalRead，digitalWrite，analogRead，analogWrite，pinMode等。还学习C语言编程的基础知识，本教程的帮助。

学会做Arduino的项目，如闪烁的LED，LED淡入，淡出，使用LDR控制LED亮度，实现温度传感器，还有更多的教程！

获取免费的Arduino代码和模仿他们。

这些Arduino的教程是一个伟大的方式来为电子，Arduino的多的世界！

用户增长与下载统计

App

作者：

下载次数:

评分：

版本：

10.9 最后更新： 2021-01-19

创建日期：

2016-12-26

发布者国家/地区：

电子邮件：

co*****@gmail.com

网址：

网站 ,隐私政策

完整描述：

来源：

Google Play 商店

数据提取于：

2026-06-09

比较统计数据和排名：

排名

# 106,496 ▼ 327

给开发者

用App Pass变现使用 Extension Booster 进行加速

联系开发者

Chrome-Stats 不拥有此 Android 应用。请使用下面的这些信息联系 Android 应用开发人员。

开发者：

CoderBro

Google Play 商店

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.CoderBro.tutorials.arduinotutorials

电子邮件：

co*****@gmail.com

网站：

https://coderbroapps.blogspot.com/

用户评价

Arduino Tutorials app is praised for its well-structured content, making it good for beginners to learn Arduino basics and projects. Users find it informative and a handy reference on mobile. However, the app suffers from excessive and disruptive ads, limited and sometimes incomplete content, small fonts, pixelated images, and occasional confusing details. Users suggest adding more projects, programming concepts, better design, and reducing ads to improve the learning experience.

优点

Well organized content suitable for beginners.
Includes a variety of Arduino basics, loops, functions, and some projects with code and circuit diagrams.
Useful as a reference on mobile devices and helpful for learning Arduino concepts away from PC.
Informative app that simplifies Arduino learning experience.
Free to use and appreciated by many users.

缺点

Excessive and intrusive advertisements, including full-screen and inappropriate ads, which negatively impact usability.
Limited amount of content; users want more projects, detailed programming concepts, and explanations (e.g., on delay() vs millis()).
Some interface issues such as small, non-zoomable fonts for code examples and pixelated images.
Confusing or incorrect details like wrong wire colors and missing parts in project lists.
Design and descriptions in some areas are weak and could be improved for clarity and educational value.