Reviews of Auto-Data.net

By: Auto-Data.net

List of user reviews and ratings for Auto-Data.net

Total ratings

3.25 (Rating count: 2,056)

Receive review notifications

Get notified when new reviews are posted so you can respond quickly.

See reviews on Google Play Store

View and respond to reviews directly on the store page.

Visit

Review summary

Auto-Data.net offers basic vehicle data and photos across many makes and models, with a working search for car marks. However, users report numerous inaccuracies, missing data, and frequent errors. The app is heavily littered with ads that disrupt usability. It lacks detailed technical specs like torque or wiring diagrams. Customer support is inadequate, and some users face data loading issues or crashes. Overall, while it provides some general car information, many find it unreliable and not worth the cost or installation.

Pros

Provides basic vehicle model data including engine size, power, transmission type, and trim levels.
Shows photos of the vehicles, helping with visual recognition.
Includes a wide range of makes and models.
Has a functioning search feature for car marks.
Some users find it useful for general car information.

Cons

Contains many errors and missing engine variations, leading to inaccurate data.
Overrun with aggressive ads, including ads with sound, which degrade user experience.
Lacks in-depth technical data such as torque specs, wiring diagrams, and engine settings.
Poor customer support and slow or inadequate responses to user feedback.
Frequent data retrieval failures and app crashes on some devices.

Upgrade to see all 51 reviews

User Reviews

Recent rating average: 3.10

All time rating average: 3.25

Upgrade to see all 51 reviews

59% (30)

Date	Author	Comment
2026-05-01	Ok*****	perfect
perfect
2026-02-21	Ro*****	Bought the pro version to support the project and to get rid of the adds. But there are two big annoyances with the pro compared to free app. You can't go back, then the app closes. So going from one car to the other is frustrating. Also there should be a toggle for the extra brands (hide and show, or...), this is now to much and to convoluted. Could these things please be fixed in a update. Code is there in the free version to go back. Adds are less frustrating then not being able to go back.
Bought the pro version to support the project and to get rid of the adds. But there are two big annoyances with the pro compared to free app. You can't go back, then the app closes. So going from one car to the other is frustrating. Also there should be a toggle for the extra brands (hide and show, or...), this is now to much and to convoluted. Could these things please be fixed in a update. Code is there in the free version to go back. Adds are less frustrating then not being able to go back.
2025-11-02	sh*****	nice work
nice work
2025-09-19	At*****	There are less car brands compared with the same app for iPhone... Why?
There are less car brands compared with the same app for iPhone... Why?
2025-09-18	Kr*****	This application was perfect until a few days ago. For a few days now it says "update," but when I press the button it sends me to the Google store without an update option... I press "open" and it takes me back to the home screen, where it says "update" again. And so on ad infinitum... Please help! Thanks!
This application was perfect until a few days ago. For a few days now it says "update," but when I press the button it sends me to the Google store without an update option... I press "open" and it takes me back to the home screen, where it says "update" again. And so on ad infinitum... Please help! Thanks!
2025-09-16	Sr*****	good
good
2025-09-14	so*****	it's great
it's great
2025-09-07	Ma*****	not the auto data you wanted
not the auto data you wanted
2025-04-06	Ah*****	no proton car
no proton car
2024-12-29	A *****	5.7 doesn't take 6.6 L in to quarts it's 6.9 but it's really 7qs with that saying deta is not all the way wrong but isn't all the way right
5.7 doesn't take 6.6 L in to quarts it's 6.9 but it's really 7qs with that saying deta is not all the way wrong but isn't all the way right