Webpages reader
Total ratings
3.10
(Rating count:
29)
Review summary
Pros
- Accomplishes basic reading tasks.
- Helpful for certain users.
- Easy to use with right-click functionality.
Cons
- Does not work well with PDFs or multi-column formats.
- Issues with voice quality and robot-like sound.
- Inconsistent performance across different websites and files.
- Contains many broken or non-functional buttons.
- Frequently fails to highlight or read selected text.
Most mentioned
- Poor quality and functionality.
- Inability to handle specific formats (like PDFs).
- Robotic voice quality.
- Issues with reading online texts and textbooks.
- User frustration with the extension not performing as expected.
Upgrade to see all 49 reviews
Recent reviews
Recent rating average:
3.00
All time rating average:
3.10
Upgrade to see all 49 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
2022-10-10 | Trevor L | poor quality, a lot of the buttons don't actually do anything and they reader is quite slow without a function button to speed it up. There are better screen readers that will be better with less hassle. | ||
2022-10-10 | Trevor L | en | poor quality, a lot of the buttons don't actually do anything and they reader is quite slow without a function button to speed it up. There are better screen readers that will be better with less hassle. | |
2022-09-14 | Ιερώνυμος Κόρακας (Ron) | It accomplishes what you need it to. However, there's several issue. My biggest one was the fact that if you copy and paste a PDF article, which is split into two columns, it'll read that split as a space - So, the reader will pause after that break - even though it maybe halfway through the sentence. Wish this could have been worked into the code so this doesn't happen. So, it makes reading Medical Journals and Articles pretty much unbearable. Also, the voices are not that well a.i. optimized. It'll still sound like a robot, regardless of how much you change the pitch and speed, and voice. Overall, it's ok because it actually does what it claims. HOW WELL it does it is why I took off the 2 stars. | ||
2022-09-14 | Ιερώνυμος Κόρακας (Ron) | en | It accomplishes what you need it to. However, there's several issue. My biggest one was the fact that if you copy and paste a PDF article, which is split into two columns, it'll read that split as a space - So, the reader will pause after that break - even though it maybe halfway through the sentence. Wish this could have been worked into the code so this doesn't happen. So, it makes reading Medical Journals and Articles pretty much unbearable. Also, the voices are not that well a.i. optimized. It'll still sound like a robot, regardless of how much you change the pitch and speed, and voice. Overall, it's ok because it actually does what it claims. HOW WELL it does it is why I took off the 2 stars. | |
2022-09-13 | TamsonCat | trash it does not work i tried everytime i highlight and do what it asks me it does not work | ||
2022-09-13 | TamsonCat | en | trash it does not work i tried everytime i highlight and do what it asks me it does not work | |
2022-05-06 | Mendel Fogel | Can't express how awesome this is and how helpful. All you do is right click anywhere on the google screen, click the extension and paste what you want it to read! Amazing and really helps, thanks so much!!!!! | ||
2022-05-06 | Mendel Fogel | en | Can't express how awesome this is and how helpful. All you do is right click anywhere on the google screen, click the extension and paste what you want it to read! Amazing and really helps, thanks so much!!!!! | |
2021-12-27 | Anna Yara | NIce app! | ||
2021-12-27 | Samia Mohammed | en | NIce app! |
Upgrade to see all 49 reviews