SEO Broken Link Checker
Check for broken links on the current page.
Total ratings
4.14
(Rating count:
7)User reviews
Recent rating average:
4.14
All time rating average:
4.14
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-25 |  | | en | I admit that I am not yet fully convinced of the functions and possibilities of the Chrome extension mentioned. I hope that my experiences so far are only a small part of the whole spectrum and that the extension will be convincing in other areas. It should be noted at this point that the extension has a relatively slow performance and does not offer a user interface that is as appealing as personal preferences. It must be stated that the programme examined is not capable of fulfilling the expectations placed on it. However, it must be stated that the tracking of URLs is not carried out in a nested manner. There is a possibility that the URLs can be copied. It is regrettable to note that the extension does not fulfil expectations. In practice, the extension proves to be less user-friendly and does not fulfil the requirement for efficient and intuitive handling. It would be extremely helpful if you could tell me who is responsible for producing such inadequate extensions. It would be very useful for further processing if you could let me know who is responsible for the production of such extensions, which unfortunately turn out to be unusable. In this context, it would be of great interest to find out whether tracking of links up to a nesting depth of five to nine could be realised. Storage in a TXT, CSV or JSON file might be a possible solution. Consideration should also be given to whether the responsibility could be assumed by someone else in order to ensure optimised implementation. |
| 2024-10-04 |  | | en | It's good up to a point. I like that you can see, from a glance, which links are good, cautionary, or bad. However, the checker doesn't tell you *why* they're bad. Having an error code with the result would go a long way to explaining the type of error the checker encounters. It also doesn't seem to differentiate between a standard hyperlink and a scripting one for dynamic functionality. For example, it marks a dropdown menu trigger or ascending/descending toggle link as (BAD) when both work perfectly. Furthermore, it struggles (understandably) with pages behind firewalls or VPNs, giving similarly incorrect link health information. With those small tweaks, it could be a great(er) extension. |
| 2024-08-06 |  | | en | Easy way to check all the links of webpage. The extension is fast, and labels each links with redirect, bad etc. |
| 2024-07-04 |  | | pt | Excelente |
| 2024-06-08 |  | | en | So far so good, its simple and solve my issue very quick |
| 2024-03-14 |  | | es | De los mejores que he probado. Escanea rápidamente la página y marca con verde los códigos de respuesta 200 y con amarillo las redirecciones o links externos. Muchos otros escanean y muestran los 200 o 400, pero no muestran las redirecciones bien. Este sí lo hace. |
| 2023-12-17 |  | | en | I use this every single day. It's a simple tool but does the job perfectly. |