Just click the tota11y icon to run tota11y from Khan Academy and visualize how your site performs with assistive technologies.
Total ratings
2.25
(Rating count:
4)
User reviews
Recent rating average:
2.00
All time rating average:
2.25
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
2024-05-02 | Diana Saimovici | es | Me pasa lo mismo que el comentario anterior. No funciona al pulsar el icono | |
2024-03-07 | Olga Carreras Montoto | es | Pulso el icono de la extensión en la barra de herramientas pero no pasa nada. | |
2021-08-30 | Eric Scoles | No added value if if you're already using WAVE, AInspector, or SiteImprove Accessibility Checker. Might have value for content-creators if they're coached on which false errors to ignore & where. That said, WAVE is better for showing document structure & a bit more robust on contrast. False errors include showing error common & standard HTML such as anchor tags & misidentifying the relevant background color, which causes it to see insufficient contrast. Bottom line: Use something more current. This was a great effort in 2016 but there are better, very reputable checkers available now. | ||
2021-08-30 | Eric Scoles | en | No added value if if you're already using WAVE, AInspector, or SiteImprove Accessibility Checker. Might have value for content-creators if they're coached on which false errors to ignore & where. That said, WAVE is better for showing document structure & a bit more robust on contrast. False errors include showing error common & standard HTML such as anchor tags & misidentifying the relevant background color, which causes it to see insufficient contrast. Bottom line: Use something more current. This was a great effort in 2016 but there are better, very reputable checkers available now. |