PrettyPrint
JavaScript and CSS formatter/syntax highlighter
Total ratings
3.86
(Rating count:
100) Upgrade to see all 34 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
2.60
All time rating average:
3.86
Upgrade to see all 34 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-20 |  | | (Comment updated Jan '23, this extension seems abandoned, see edits) Pros: - Highlighting looks good - You can change the indentation, I use two spaces Cons: - Clicking reset button is automatically saved, so if you click it accidentally you are screwed. - Does not convert url(/images/img.png) to a link, which would be handy - After prettifying the line numbering is completely useless, as it adds it separates lines. Notepad++ has a solution for this if you turn word wrapping on, this should be adopted. Update: 1. I found in some cases the script actually changes. For example the minified version of Selectize 0.15.2 works fine if copied into chrome JS console and ran directly. If you use pretty print and then copy the code, it gives an error. In that example the Pretty Print extension converts """ to """ which causes a syntax error. 2. The colors are completely unusable because my source code page uses a dark background and the theme is designed for a light background. Half of the code isn't readable, so I have to get rid of it anyway. This has not been addressed since June 2022 and the extension hasn't been updated since 2012 lol. | |
| 2022-06-14 |  | | What I wanted. Thanks for the work. I think it'd be good if you add an option to revert the code back to its normal mode (un-beautified & un-indented). Currently, a workaround to do that, is though reloading the page. | |
| 2022-05-20 |  | | Stopped woring! Used to work on older versions but not it does nothing. | |
| 2022-05-17 |  | | Doesn't work w/ dark mode and has not been updated since 2012. | |
| 2022-02-24 |  | | Very hart to read Formatted JSON in Dark Mode. Please add CSS for Dark Mode. | |
| 2021-08-28 |  | | Not doing anything at all | |
| 2018-04-17 | 王龙 | | very good,thank you | |
| 2016-10-26 |  | | Didn't work with a json request (even though the response header had content-type: application/json) | |
| 2016-08-16 |  | | superb.. its very helpful for developer. use this tool when u inspect others website and want to fin something in js or css. | |
| 2015-12-18 |  | | Crash a lot of time |
Upgrade to see all 34 reviews