Rapid Journal Quality Check
Displays rankings and h-index for academic journals next to Google Scholar search results.
Total ratings
4.48
(Rating count:
44)Review summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated. Pros
- Very helpful tool for researchers
- Saves time by consolidating journal quality information
- Seamless integration with Google Scholar
- Diverse range of rankings available for different disciplines
- Empowers decision-making in academic publishing
Cons
- Outdated database and rankings
- Incorrect journal rankings and assignments
- Need for more reliable metrics like Web of Science
- Linking issues with journal metrics and summaries
- Lack of updates regarding the latest journal lists
Most mentioned
- Updating the database and rankings
- Incorrect or unreliable journal rankings
- Integration with Google Scholar
- Need for more comprehensive metrics
- General appreciation for the tool's functionality
Upgrade to see all 47 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
4.60
All time rating average:
4.48
Upgrade to see all 47 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 |  | | en | It is the perfect extension for scholars who want to improve their knowledge of the Journal's quality. A small request for the team is to update the AJG 2024! |
| 2024-11-13 |  | | ||
| 2024-10-30 |  | | en | just today I got a reading error, the article should not be in Q2 because the journal is "Jurnal Bisnis dan Pembangunan" but when I looked at the Q2 icon, it turned out to read the journal "economica" which is a local sub-journal, the article was incorrectly ranked Scopus by RJQC |
| 2024-09-04 |  | | en | One of the best extensions ever known to man. Keep the hard work guys, it helps a lot. |
| 2024-08-03 |  | | en | The study link is not activated in addition to the summary, Please keep updating the database. We don't have to see journal quality lists back and forth saving us a lot of time. Thank you team. |
| 2024-07-19 |  | | en | Please keep updating the database. We don't have to see journal quality lists back and forth saving us a lot of time. Thank you team. |
| 2024-07-15 |  | | en | Firstly, hats off to the developers for such an useful tool. secondly please update the rankings from time to time, for example for the journal "Management review quarterly" ABDC shows "NA", but in real, it is ranked "C". Thanks in advance, I hope these changes are made for the improvement of this "supertool". |
| 2024-07-06 |  | | ||
| 2024-06-24 |  | | en | Thank you, you saved me |
| 2024-06-08 |  | | en | It is good idea. Very helpful. However there are small challanges such as in case of "Economic and Political Weekly" B on ABDC but is not listed. The link on EPW would lend at Higher Education Abstract(https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hea.12103_23). |
Upgrade to see all 47 reviews