Chrome-Stats extension
Rapid Journal Quality Check
Displays rankings and h-index for academic journals next to Google Scholar search results.
Total ratings for Rapid Journal Quality Check
4.42
(Rating count:
33)
User reviews summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated.
Pros
- Seamless integration with Google Scholar
- Flexibility in catering to different disciplines
- Valuable for early-stage researchers
Cons
- Issues with rankings and hyperlinks
- Confusion with journal assignments
- Reliability of data from Scimago
Most mentioned
- Seamless integration with Google Scholar
- Valuable for early-stage researchers
- Issues with rankings and hyperlinks
Upgrade to see all 31 reviews
Recent reviews for Rapid Journal Quality Check
Recent rating average:
3.30
All time rating average:
4.42
Upgrade to see all 31 reviews
Rating filters
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-07 |  |
|
en | Really helpful! Will you be updating the VHB Rankings as there is a new version that recently came out? How will you deal with the partial (topic-specific) ratings they provide if a journal has different ratings in different research areas? |
| 2024-04-29 |  |
|
en | It is showing personnel review - emerald journal in Q2 where as it is in Q1 and it has many glitches |
| 2024-02-28 |  |
|
en | Thank you for consolidating all the SJR (Scimago Journal & Country Rank) into a single venture. Your work is commendable! However, there are still several tasks to address, including fixing issues related to the ranking of non-ranked articles and ensuring proper hyperlinks between different articles. Recently, I noticed that the quick summary of articles categorized as % Q1, %Q2, %Q3, and N/A has disappeared. As a suggestion, instead of displaying ‘N/A,’ consider coding it as empty. |
| 2024-02-27 |  |
|
en | It make google scholar more valuable. Much helpful. How we can get summary of Q ranking papers of a researcher, like how much % Q1, how much % Q2 etc. |
| 2024-02-23 |  |
|
en | A useful tool for researchers. |
| 2024-01-29 |  |
|
en | ABDC List and SJR are still the old ones. Please update the journal latest ABDC list. Moreover, I see that getting on a list shows some quality over others. But, still showing a journal as red color (those that have a low ranking such as AJG 1, or ABDC - C, creates negative image of the journal which is unfair). Hence, the color scheme should be planned in a way that it does not create negative image of the journals that are already on the lists. |
| 2024-01-23 |  |
|
en | Scientific Journal Ranking is good but should based on WoS more. I saw the other ranking are for business, economic, and computer science. It will be more interesting if you add more ranking for engineering field. One more thing is Impact Factor adding. |
| 2024-01-20 |  |
|
||
| 2024-01-07 |  |
|
en | It takes data from Scimago page where discontinued journals also showing Q1,Q2 quartiles and this also indicate same without verification.. not reliable for Scimago and Also there is no ranking for the Web of Science metrices ... use with cautions |
| 2024-01-07 |  |
|
en | Very good tool! However, it will be great to link it to the Scopus Journal Metrics as the are public too. |
Upgrade to see all 31 reviews