Rapid Journal Quality Check
Displays rankings and h-index for academic journals next to Google Scholar search results.
Total ratings
4.50
(Rating count:
46)Review summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated. Pros
- Useful tool for assessing journal quality quickly
- Seamless integration with Google Scholar
- Helps save time in research by consolidating information
- Diverse range of rankings catering to different disciplines
- Commendable work by developers
Cons
- Outdated quality index and rankings
- Glitches in journal ranking and categorization
- Lack of links to current databases like Web of Science
- Negative color scheme for low-ranked journals
- Inconsistent journal ranking display
Most mentioned
- Need for frequent updates to databases and rankings
- Request for integration of newer ranking sources
- Issues with incorrect journal categorization
- Appreciation for the time-saving capabilities
- Desire for more transparency and accuracy in rankings
Upgrade to see all 49 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
4.80
All time rating average:
4.50
Upgrade to see all 49 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-04 |  | | ||
| 2024-12-07 |  | | en | A useful tool for quickly assessing journal quality while exploring research papers. However, the quality index lists need more frequent updates, as many seem outdated. Developers are encouraged to incorporate the latest sources, and I am happy to assist with authentic references of journal quality lists, if needed. |
| 2024-11-19 |  | | en | It is the perfect extension for scholars who want to improve their knowledge of the Journal's quality. A small request for the team is to update the AJG 2024! |
| 2024-11-13 |  | | ||
| 2024-10-30 |  | | en | just today I got a reading error, the article should not be in Q2 because the journal is "Jurnal Bisnis dan Pembangunan" but when I looked at the Q2 icon, it turned out to read the journal "economica" which is a local sub-journal, the article was incorrectly ranked Scopus by RJQC |
| 2024-09-04 |  | | en | One of the best extensions ever known to man. Keep the hard work guys, it helps a lot. |
| 2024-08-03 |  | | en | The study link is not activated in addition to the summary, Please keep updating the database. We don't have to see journal quality lists back and forth saving us a lot of time. Thank you team. |
| 2024-07-19 |  | | en | Please keep updating the database. We don't have to see journal quality lists back and forth saving us a lot of time. Thank you team. |
| 2024-07-15 |  | | en | Firstly, hats off to the developers for such an useful tool. secondly please update the rankings from time to time, for example for the journal "Management review quarterly" ABDC shows "NA", but in real, it is ranked "C". Thanks in advance, I hope these changes are made for the improvement of this "supertool". |
| 2024-07-06 |  | |
Upgrade to see all 49 reviews