Displays rankings and h-index for academic journals next to Google Scholar search results.
Total ratings
4.45
(Rating count:
42)
Review summary
Pros
- Very helpful for researchers to evaluate journal quality
- Seamless integration with Google Scholar
- Saves time by consolidating journal quality lists
- Flexibility in rankings catering to various disciplines
- User-friendly tool that enhances research efficiency
Cons
- Needs more frequent updates for journal rankings and databases
- Occasional misclassification of journals and articles
- Links and summaries are sometimes not functional or missing
- Lacks comprehensive ranking options like Web of Science
- Color scheme may create negative perceptions of lower-ranked journals
Most mentioned
- Database updates needed
- Integration with Google Scholar
- Tool is helpful for researchers
- Misclassification of journal rankings
- Valuable for early-stage researchers
Upgrade to see all 45 reviews
Recent reviews
Recent rating average:
4.60
All time rating average:
4.45
Upgrade to see all 45 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
2024-10-30 | Hariyono Darmawan | en | just today I got a reading error, the article should not be in Q2 because the journal is "Jurnal Bisnis dan Pembangunan" but when I looked at the Q2 icon, it turned out to read the journal "economica" which is a local sub-journal, the article was incorrectly ranked Scopus by RJQC | |
2024-09-04 | Pedro Paulo | en | One of the best extensions ever known to man. Keep the hard work guys, it helps a lot. | |
2024-08-03 | ELQarar القرار | en | The study link is not activated in addition to the summary, Please keep updating the database. We don't have to see journal quality lists back and forth saving us a lot of time. Thank you team. | |
2024-07-19 | Sumit Manderna | en | Please keep updating the database. We don't have to see journal quality lists back and forth saving us a lot of time. Thank you team. | |
2024-07-15 | Sachin Malik | en | Firstly, hats off to the developers for such an useful tool. secondly please update the rankings from time to time, for example for the journal "Management review quarterly" ABDC shows "NA", but in real, it is ranked "C". Thanks in advance, I hope these changes are made for the improvement of this "supertool". | |
2024-07-06 | Abdullah Yaseen | |||
2024-06-24 | Nguyễn Thành Đạt B21DCVT119 | en | Thank you, you saved me | |
2024-06-08 | Sushil Kumar Pare | en | It is good idea. Very helpful. However there are small challanges such as in case of "Economic and Political Weekly" B on ABDC but is not listed. The link on EPW would lend at Higher Education Abstract(https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hea.12103_23). | |
2024-05-16 | Chính Hoàng | |||
2024-05-07 | Sophie | en | Really helpful! Will you be updating the VHB Rankings as there is a new version that recently came out? How will you deal with the partial (topic-specific) ratings they provide if a journal has different ratings in different research areas? |
Upgrade to see all 45 reviews