Displays rankings and h-index for academic journals next to Google Scholar search results.
Total ratings
4.49
(Rating count:
45)
Review summary
Pros
- Useful tool for quickly assessing journal quality.
- Streamlines research process by integrating with Google Scholar.
- Diverse range of rankings catering to different disciplines.
Cons
- Database and quality index lists need more frequent updates.
- Issues with incorrect journal rankings.
- Glitches and inaccuracies in displayed information.
Most mentioned
- Requests for more frequent updates of journal rankings.
- Incorrect or outdated journal quality listings.
- Need for better integration with various ranking sources like Web of Science and Scopus.
Upgrade to see all 48 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
4.80
All time rating average:
4.49
Upgrade to see all 48 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
2024-12-07 | Digvijay Samir | en | A useful tool for quickly assessing journal quality while exploring research papers. However, the quality index lists need more frequent updates, as many seem outdated. Developers are encouraged to incorporate the latest sources, and I am happy to assist with authentic references of journal quality lists, if needed. | |
2024-11-19 | Taewoo Roh | en | It is the perfect extension for scholars who want to improve their knowledge of the Journal's quality. A small request for the team is to update the AJG 2024! | |
2024-11-13 | Superkartoffel | |||
2024-10-30 | Hariyono Darmawan | en | just today I got a reading error, the article should not be in Q2 because the journal is "Jurnal Bisnis dan Pembangunan" but when I looked at the Q2 icon, it turned out to read the journal "economica" which is a local sub-journal, the article was incorrectly ranked Scopus by RJQC | |
2024-09-04 | Pedro Paulo | en | One of the best extensions ever known to man. Keep the hard work guys, it helps a lot. | |
2024-08-03 | ELQarar القرار | en | The study link is not activated in addition to the summary, Please keep updating the database. We don't have to see journal quality lists back and forth saving us a lot of time. Thank you team. | |
2024-07-19 | Sumit Manderna | en | Please keep updating the database. We don't have to see journal quality lists back and forth saving us a lot of time. Thank you team. | |
2024-07-15 | Sachin Malik | en | Firstly, hats off to the developers for such an useful tool. secondly please update the rankings from time to time, for example for the journal "Management review quarterly" ABDC shows "NA", but in real, it is ranked "C". Thanks in advance, I hope these changes are made for the improvement of this "supertool". | |
2024-07-06 | Abdullah Yaseen | |||
2024-06-24 | Nguyễn Thành Đạt B21DCVT119 | en | Thank you, you saved me |
Upgrade to see all 48 reviews