Resurrectio
Functional-oriented and javascript-friendly test recorder. Exports CasperJS scripts. Supports screenshots.
Total ratings
4.36
(Rating count:
28)Review summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated. Pros
- Speeds up the automation testing process
- Clean code and helpful for creating test scenarios
- Great tool for both testers and developers
- Better than Selenium IDE
- Works effectively despite needing some custom tweaks
Cons
- Misses many steps and interactions
- Workflow and UI require improvements
- Form fills are generated in chunks
- Requires custom tweaks for individual tests
Most mentioned
- Great tool
- Makes life easier
- Helpful for automation testing
Upgrade to see all 32 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
3.80
All time rating average:
4.36
Upgrade to see all 32 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-04 |  | | WOW this makes life so much easier! | |
| 2017-03-04 |  | | en | WOW this makes life so much easier! |
| 2016-03-08 |  | | Misses steps out and the ones it does have do not work. Perhaps it may be use to some users. | |
| 2016-03-08 |  | | en | Misses steps out and the ones it does have do not work. Perhaps it may be use to some users. |
| 2015-10-21 |  | | Missing a lot of interactions but the code is quiet clean. Not to bad plugin and helpful to create test scenarios. Much better than writing everything from scratch. We use this tool to get a rough click path and improve it manually to get an accurate test case. | |
| 2015-10-22 |  | | en | Missing a lot of interactions but the code is quiet clean. Not to bad plugin and helpful to create test scenarios. Much better than writing everything from scratch. We use this tool to get a rough click path and improve it manually to get an accurate test case. |
| 2015-03-09 |  | | It can use some improvements for workflow and UI, but come on, its a tool that works so I gave it a 5 You will still want to do custom tweaks for your own tests, but it speeds the process up a lot. | |
| 2014-09-19 |  | | en | It can use some improvements for workflow and UI, but come on, its a tool that works so I gave it a 5 You will still want to do custom tweaks for your own tests, but it speeds the process up a lot. |
| 2015-02-19 |  | | Cool. But missed many button clicks and other acts. Form fill is separated and generated as chunks. | |
| 2015-02-19 |  | | en | Cool. But missed many button clicks and other acts. Form fill is separated and generated as chunks. |
Upgrade to see all 32 reviews