Shinigami Eyes
Highlights transphobic/anti-LGBT and trans-friendly subreddits/users/facebook pages/groups with different colors.
Total ratings
4.17
(Rating count:
281)Review summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated. Pros
- Helps users identify transphobic or supportive accounts.
- Works effectively for its intended purpose.
- User-friendly design with adjustable color schemes.
Cons
- Lacks context for why users are marked, making it difficult to trust the designations.
- Tendency to inaccurately flag accounts, particularly those with leftist views or other potential biases.
- Some users find color distinctions between flags and links confusing.
Most mentioned
- The need for better context on why users are flagged.
- Concerns about bias against certain political or social groups.
- Overall usefulness in identifying problematic accounts.
Upgrade to see all 228 reviews
Recent reviews
Recent rating average:
3.50
All time rating average:
4.17
Upgrade to see all 228 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 |  | | en | helps. not perfect, but the best tool we have. |
| 2024-10-27 |  | | en | Marks Several racist, Anti-Transmasc users as Green on the site and also give no context to why some are marked as red |
| 2024-10-21 |  | | en | Gives no context as to why they were flagged, and without context it becomes useless. One of the "anti" people I follow IS pro-trans, it just came to light that she said some things as a teenager struggling with her own gender and religion. Even without that, Anyone who works with the general public knows that many people don't do things like "nuance" and "reading" unless (maybe) it furthers their beliefs. I can't blindly trust one random kid 7 years ago to have info that was both accurate and (somehow) eternally correct. for example Is the "bad" flag correct, or just someone trying to hurt them? Either out of individual spite or as an organized effort by anti-trans people? Was it by someone who had bad information, or completely misunderstood something they said? Is this group bad, or did some kid get yelled at by a TERF in their comment section and think that meant the group is bad? Is this green person actively transphobic but marked green because they're trans? Are they marked green because they like one gender of trans but ignoring that they hate others? It doesn't matter WHAT they're marked until we know WHY they're marked. |
| 2024-10-06 |  | | en | Glory to the family, no freaks. From the heart to the sun. I condemn minorities |
| 2024-09-07 |  | | ||
| 2024-09-05 |  | | en | If you're having trouble with the red being too similar to the dark red "dead links" on wikis, there are other color schemes you can choose like this: right-click>Shinigami Eyes>Settings>Colors (3 color options)>Save |
| 2024-08-21 |  | | en | Not actually what it claims to be. It doesn't highlight anti-trans pages red, it highlights specifically transmisogynistic pages red, and is so insanely biased against trans men and non-binary people that even the pages of trans women who are express active hatred of those groups are marked green simply by virtue of being trans women. The creator also believes that terms such as "theyfab" aren't slurs. Overall, just avoid this. |
| 2024-08-19 |  | | ||
| 2024-07-31 |  | | en | works great, serves its' purpose perfectly! if i were to have any complaint it would only be that the color it highlights transphobic people and pages in is VERY similar to the color for hyperlinks to pages that don't exist on wikipedia |
| 2024-07-16 |  | | en | Works like a charm. :) |
Upgrade to see all 228 reviews