Shows the higher res version of an image, if it exists.
Total ratings
3.87
(Rating count:
15)
Review summary
Pros
- Works exactly as intended
- Very convenient
- Useful for accessing higher resolution images
Cons
- Doesn't work at all for some users
- Bulkiness when dealing with many images
- Doesn't function on the Tumblr dashboard
Most mentioned
- Doesn't work at all / completely useless
- Request for a button extension to keep in the same tab
- Convenient and useful functionality
User reviews
Recent rating average:
3.20
All time rating average:
3.87
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-07-22 | Dede Sutanto | doesnt work at all. completely useless. | ||
2017-07-22 | Dede Sutanto | en | doesnt work at all. completely useless. | |
2015-02-17 | Francisco T. A. G. | Hi. I think it comes to be a little bit bulky when youre dealing with a bunch of images... so, my request would be if you could do another extnsion in where instead of opening another tab, the extension is a button where if you click it, it takes you from the low res image, to the 1280 url, but in the same tab. thanks. | ||
2015-02-18 | Francisco T. A. G. | en | Hi. I think it comes to be a little bit bulky when youre dealing with a bunch of images... so, my request would be if you could do another extnsion in where instead of opening another tab, the extension is a button where if you click it, it takes you from the low res image, to the 1280 url, but in the same tab. thanks. | |
2015-01-15 | Juliana Eleutério | So useful! | ||
2015-01-15 | Juliana Eleutério | en | So useful! | |
2014-11-06 | Panther Wills | I need it to work on the dashboard since things look terrible on the retina display. This extension doesn't do that for me. | ||
2014-11-06 | Panther Wills | en | I need it to work on the dashboard since things look terrible on the retina display. This extension doesn't do that for me. | |
2013-01-03 | Eli Nelson | Works exactly as intended, very convenient! I'd pay about 7 dollars for this, if it weren't free. | ||
2013-01-03 | Faye Nelson | en | Works exactly as intended, very convenient! I'd pay about 7 dollars for this, if it weren't free. |