AI Content Detector - Copyleaks
Verify what content was written by a human or an AI chatbot with the AI Content Detector browser extension from Copyleaks.
Total ratings
4.10
(Rating count:
609)Review summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated. Pros
- Good for detecting AI content
- Accurate and fast response
- Helpful for educators
Cons
- Inaccurately flags human-written content as AI-generated
- Inconsistent results depending on how content is submitted
- Unreliable and misleading AI detection algorithm
Most mentioned
- Disappointment with accuracy and reliability
- Mislabeling of genuine human-written content
- Frustration over the impact on credibility and trust
Upgrade to see all 547 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
1.40
All time rating average:
4.10
Upgrade to see all 547 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-20 |  | | en | i wish there were a zero-star option. Your software should be in the garbage! |
| 2024-12-14 |  | | en | DO NOT USE THIS ! I wrote research paper without using Ai or anything and it said 100% AI CONTENT any text you put it will say 100% Ai content |
| 2024-12-12 |  | | en | bad |
| 2024-12-12 |  | | en | Good for AI content detect I recommend this! |
| 2024-12-11 |  | | en | Not accurate. |
| 2024-12-05 |  | | en | Copyleaks has been incredibly disappointing. When I tested it by inputting 3-4 paragraphs together, it incorrectly flagged the content as AI-generated. However, when I submitted the same text one paragraph at a time, it identified it as human-written. This inconsistency cost me a client, which is entirely unacceptable. I expected more reliability from such a platform, and this experience has left me extremely dissatisfied. |
| 2024-12-02 |  | | zh | 爛透了 |
| 2024-11-29 |  | | en | I am deeply disappointed with copyleaks. For the past like 2 weeks, the platform flags my content as AI-generated. This is not only inaccurate but also damaging, as it undermines the credibility of my work and raises unnecessary concerns about its authenticity. Such errors are unacceptable for a service that claims to provide reliable plagiarism and AI detection. It's infact unrealiable and misleading. Something needs to be done to restore the lost trust |
| 2024-11-26 |  | | en | Is anyone else experiencing this? I am deeply disappointed with copyleaks. For the past like 2 weeks, the platform flags my content as AI-generated. This is not only inaccurate but also damaging, as it undermines the credibility of my work and raises unnecessary concerns about its authenticity. Such errors are unacceptable for a service that claims to provide reliable plagiarism and AI detection. It's infact unrealiable and misleading. Their AI detection algorithm is flawed and requires immediate improvement. What happens to we subscribers who who rely on accurate assessments in academic and professional contexts? I cannot recommend this service to anyone. Proceed with caution if you value the integrity of your work. |
| 2024-11-26 |  | | en | Absolutely useless. Copyleaks constantly mislabels genuine human-written content as AI-generated, completely undermining its purpose. A waste of time and money—do not trust this tool. Its accuracy is nonexistent, making it worse than useless. Complete garbage. |
Upgrade to see all 547 reviews