Nobias
Get valuable insights on the news you read online.
Total ratings for Nobias
4.72
(Rating count:
29)
User reviews summary
Pros
- Helps identify political biases and credibility of news sources
- Works in the background and does not interfere with browsing experience
- Can be useful in expanding reading habits and breaking out of 'filter bubbles'
Cons
- The extension's accuracy and method of rating news sources has been called into question
- Does not work with some international publications
Most mentioned
- Identifies political bias and credibility of news articles prior to clicking
- Works quietly in the background
- Helps users make informed decisions about what news content to consume
Upgrade to see all 32 reviews
Recent reviews for Nobias
Recent rating average:
4.30
All time rating average:
4.72
Upgrade to see all 32 reviews
Rating filters
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-09-11 | John Franson | Unfortunately, it got the article ratings wrong too often to be really useful. | ||
2019-08-19 | Juan Mendez | A smart and friendly little watchdog that warns you about fake news and bias content. | ||
2019-07-09 | Damla Ozdalga | Super helpful extension and works very well with many sources - would highly recommend! It's impossible to be familiar with every news source and this does a good job of assessing and helping you filter the noise | ||
2019-05-18 | Bryan Stark | The idea is 5-star but implementation is 2-star, e.g. 3-star total IMHO. For example it claims that CNN is a highly credible "slightly center left leaning" source, when they are the epitome of fake-news! So credibility is based upon how wide-spread the news is world-wide, i.e. "wide-spread." However, if you could count how many times they went with fake stories that they had to retract, they would definitely be low-credible source. To be fair they are mostly correct on a binary level; they correctly identify news that caters to the left or right of center, even if they incorrectly portray to what degree. | ||
2019-05-18 | Bryan “Ironman” Stark | en | The idea is 5-star but implementation is 2-star, e.g. 3-star total IMHO. For example it claims that CNN is a highly credible "slightly center left leaning" source, when they are the epitome of fake-news! So credibility is based upon how wide-spread the news is world-wide, i.e. "wide-spread." However, if you could count how many times they went with fake stories that they had to retract, they would definitely be low-credible source. To be fair they are mostly correct on a binary level; they correctly identify news that caters to the left or right of center, even if they incorrectly portray to what degree. | |
2019-05-01 | Ashish kumar naagar | Well, TBH I stumble upon this by mistake but Now I am loving it. If you love reading and majority of your time spent in front of computer screen you shouldn't miss this extension. Would love a app which can work on android. That would be lovely. | ||
2019-04-30 | Tnmy Crprt | Online news is like the Wild West now. Who are you supposed to trust anymore. Not even sure about this but I’m going to give it a shot and see. | ||
2019-04-28 | My Game | Imho I don’t know if I’d use this every day as there are certain publications that I trust no matter what even if I don’t agree with the author or the opinion in the article. Still this seems like it could help with some of those publications I’m not familiar with and if I should even bother reading it. | ||
2019-02-26 | Rubel Ahmed | This is great. Don’t even know it’s working in the background until I go to search for news. Then I can check if I should read it or not. | ||
2019-02-24 | Sayed Hossain | So I saw a Facebook ad for this thing and decided why not. I’m a journalism student - not sure why when it seems like journalists are not the favorite people right now. Anyways makes me think about what are my own biases and if I can even write without them. I just want to get a job out of school. |
Upgrade to see all 32 reviews