A Chrome extension for recording browser interaction and generating Cypress scripts
Total ratings
4.88
(Rating count:
16)
Review summary
Pros
- easy to use
- very useful
- helps identify DOM elements
- good for testing third-party components
- works well
Cons
- lacks TypeScript support
Most mentioned
- works for web octopusindonesia.com
- I wish there was a TypeScript implementation though
- Of course, it cannot replace a self-written test
Upgrade to see all 20 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
5.00
All time rating average:
4.88
Upgrade to see all 20 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
2024-11-01 | Geovanne Alves | |||
2024-06-16 | Anna Sadka | |||
2022-08-13 | jagoan spin | works for web octopusindonesia.com | ||
2022-08-13 | jagoan spin | en | works for web octopusindonesia.com | |
2022-03-08 | Michael Schantin | Of course, it cannot replace a self-written test, but it is useful from time to time to identify DOM elements more easily. | ||
2022-03-08 | Michael Schantin | en | Of course, it cannot replace a self-written test, but it is useful from time to time to identify DOM elements more easily. | |
2021-11-09 | Kiran Randhawa | I tried a few of these extensions out, this one was the easiest to use be far. I wish there was a typescript implementation though. | ||
2021-11-09 | Kiran Randhawa | en | I tried a few of these extensions out, this one was the easiest to use be far. I wish there was a typescript implementation though. | |
2020-08-10 | Mostafa Hosseinkhani | very useful | ||
2020-08-10 | Mostafa Hosseinkhani | en | very useful |
Upgrade to see all 20 reviews