Allows the user to easily initiate an unblock request when an HTTPS site was denied by the adam:ONE® system.
Total ratings
4.33
(Rating count:
18)
Review summary
Pros
- Provides valuable functionality for managing white-lists.
- Indispensable when used with other extensions like HTTP Request Blocker.
- Simple and straightforward to use.
- Excellent at solving specific problems for users.
- Utilizes Layer 2 protection by evaluating domain reputation before connections.
Cons
- Lacks transparency about background listeners and data collection.
- Potentially impacts user privacy by capturing entire browsing history.
- Performance concerns when sending traffic through the extension's site.
Most mentioned
- Need for better disclosure regarding data collection and privacy.
- Helps in whitelisting and managing connections effectively.
- Users express high frequency of using the extension daily.
Upgrade to see all 16 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
4.20
All time rating average:
4.33
Upgrade to see all 16 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-08-13 | Live for Technology | You really need to disclose that you have a listener set up in the background via blockedhttpsdetector_background.js that literally catches ALL error URLs, and apparently ALL headers of sites I browse to your site of http://mytools.management/isblocked". Nowhere in the description or installation does it inform me as the user that my ENTIRE browsing history/activity is potentially being not only sent to your site (privacy) but then what obviously happens to my browsing performance if/when we all have to first send our traffic through your site?!? This alone takes it from a five-star extension to a one(zero)-star IMO and no way I'll continue to use it. | ||
2019-08-14 | Live for Technology | en | You really need to disclose that you have a listener set up in the background via blockedhttpsdetector_background.js that literally catches ALL error URLs, and apparently ALL headers of sites I browse to your site of http://mytools.management/isblocked". Nowhere in the description or installation does it inform me as the user that my ENTIRE browsing history/activity is potentially being not only sent to your site (privacy) but then what obviously happens to my browsing performance if/when we all have to first send our traffic through your site?!? This alone takes it from a five-star extension to a one(zero)-star IMO and no way I'll continue to use it. | |
2019-02-08 | A Chase Turner | Before DNSThingy, I thought Cisco's Umbrella product was my best line of protection, except for the bypass of DNS lookups via HTTPS. DNSThingy's DTTS product is a singularly brilliant strategy to enforce protection at Layer 2 -- by assuring any outgoing connection is first qualified via a FQDN which allows one to evaluate the domain's reputation BEFORE allowing the connection! | ||
2019-02-08 | A Chase Turner | en | Before DNSThingy, I thought Cisco's Umbrella product was my best line of protection, except for the bypass of DNS lookups via HTTPS. DNSThingy's DTTS product is a singularly brilliant strategy to enforce protection at Layer 2 -- by assuring any outgoing connection is first qualified via a FQDN which allows one to evaluate the domain's reputation BEFORE allowing the connection! | |
2018-07-19 | Roman K | Simple, straigforward, valuable. Indispensable for using with HTTP Request Blocker extension. | ||
2018-07-19 | Roman K | en | Simple, straigforward, valuable. Indispensable for using with HTTP Request Blocker extension. | |
2018-03-28 | Daryl Siemens | Makes whitelisting possible! | ||
2018-03-28 | Daryl Siemens | en | Makes whitelisting possible! | |
2017-03-15 | Geoffrey Shaw | Excellent! Solved my problem! | ||
2017-03-15 | Geoffrey Shaw | en | Excellent! Solved my problem! |
Upgrade to see all 16 reviews