AI-driven wiki aggregator created to enhance user experience on Wikipedia by streamlining knowledge consumption
Total ratings
4.74
(Rating count:
7,935)
Review summary
Pros
- User-friendly and visually appealing design
- Customizable themes and options
- Has been a long-time free tool enjoyed by users
Cons
- Introduction of AI features that users find distracting and unnecessary
- Recent updates leading to a less favorable user interface
- Mandatory account login and subscription for features that were previously free
Most mentioned
- Negative impact of the recent redesign
- Increase in advertisements and prompts for premium features
- Users expressing dissatisfaction with the shift towards monetization
Upgrade to see all 707 reviews
Recent reviews
Recent rating average:
2.80
All time rating average:
4.74
Upgrade to see all 707 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
2024-11-13 | Art F | |||
2024-11-06 | Martin Magnusson | en | Rate Limit Exceeded .. Useless | |
2024-10-31 | Rene _ | de | ich wünsche mir die version davor zurück. die neue ist mich zu viel und unbrauchbar. login will ich bei einer extension auch nicht. deaktiviert. | |
2024-10-31 | Eduardo Ceceña | en | Pretty cool extension, but whenever I try to search something in the search bar it reloads the page and adds " ?title= something " to the URL bar. Forcing me to search the article by writing it on the actual URL, which is so dumb and a waste of time. The new UI is.. good? I like a lot of the things you added and the moving things around so there's a clearer view just give me back my dirt theme or "nature" theme as you call it. And please just remove the ad about upgrading Wikiwand springing and blocking view of the article which is blatantly made so you HAVE to look at the upgrades. And who is paying 5+ dollars a month for the timeline function? I only mention the timeline because you can use any of the FREE AIs at your disposal to chat and to ask them the top questions and much more. Why do I have to use an account to use Wikiwand? The goal of Wikiwand isn't supossed to be to make money, so why are you out here trying to harvest my data? | |
2024-10-29 | Zainab Mansoor | |||
2024-10-29 | Tentrillitrestrigintatrecentiligtrecentillion Plus1 | |||
2024-10-29 | Daniel M Davis | en | This extension is fantastic! It brings all the major wikis together in one place, with a user friendly and visually appealing design. The customizable themes offer a remarkable range of design options. Impressive! | |
2024-10-28 | Yevhenii Arseniev | en | I've been happy to use this product for 5+ years for free. With the new update, I've only just started experimenting with the AI features, but I'm already subscribed. I really want to support this project and make sure it grows into something even more amazing! | |
2024-10-25 | Geoffrey James | en | Never as good as it previously was, where Wikipediae was excellent; and "5 Stars". Now, it has gone rather childish. And paying for this, in my opinion, is a bit of a rip off all round. But, once again and in my opinion, that's the good old US of A for you, where avarice is now the main god of everything, and it doesn't matter how money to be made, as long as it is made!!! Who really needs "AI" for this? AI is most distracting as well as being tiresome. AI is supposed to make our Iife easier. | |
2024-10-24 | Tavis Bibby | en | Had to stop using wikiwand since the A.I., subscription update and putting the black theme in the paywall didn't help. I've switched to different extension. It was 5 stars before the change. |
Upgrade to see all 707 reviews