Chrome-Stats extension
Hive AI Detector
Check if text, images, audio or videos are AI generated
Total ratings for Hive AI Detector
4.88
(Rating count:
375)
User reviews summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated.
Pros
- Highly accurate in detecting AI-generated content
- Valuable tool for content creators and academics
- Quick at finding potentially manipulated information
- Constantly being updated to detect the most sophisticated AI-generated content
Cons
- Can produce false positives
- Developers do not respond to complaints
- Some users question its reliability and accuracy
Most mentioned
- Detecting potentially manipulated information
- Valuable tool for ensuring content authenticity
- High accuracy in detecting AI-generated content
- Reliability and responsiveness of developers
Upgrade to see all 373 reviews
Recent reviews for Hive AI Detector
Recent rating average:
2.40
All time rating average:
4.88
Upgrade to see all 373 reviews
Rating filters
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 |  |
|
en | False report in rare cases both thinking AI art is human drawn art and human drawn art is AI art |
| 2024-04-09 |  |
|
||
| 2024-04-09 |  |
|
en | nice |
| 2024-03-22 |  |
|
en | it doesnt work as much anymore. it needs to be updated |
| 2024-03-21 |  |
|
en | stopped working reliably sometime early this year. It can detect ai images but can also produce a lot of false positives! worse of all the developers do not respond nor reply to reviewers complaints |
| 2024-03-20 |  |
|
pl | Bardzo dobre narzędzie do wykrywania AI. Polecam. |
| 2024-03-14 |  |
|
en | This plugin will make a well-educated but potentially wrong guess about whether an image is AI-generated or not. I tried this plugin on a website where users share AI generated images, so I knew for a fact that nothing on the page was real. While the plugin accurately flagged most images as 100% likely to be AI, it also detected a few as 0% likely. It also failed to identify real images that had been manipulated with AI, as well as AI-generated images that had been subsequently edited with traditional tools like Photoshop. If you're interested in determining whether images online "might be made by AI" this could be a useful tool, as long as you don't rely on its judgement to be accurate. |
| 2024-03-09 |  |
|
en | Not even accurate. Experiment 1: I tested it on 4 images non-AI generated with same composition and noise but different mood color schemes: normal, muted, night, and saturated afternoon mood. 2 (normal and muted) out of 4 were detected as AI generated images (false positive), and the other 2 (night, and saturated afternoon) were detected as non-AI generated images (true positive). Acc: 50% Experiment 2: Same images as Experiment 1 but without noise. All 4 images were detected as non-AI generated images. Experiment 3: Same images but different Save as Experiment 1. On Experiment 1, I merged all layers together the same each image. While on Experiment 3, I kept all layers separated then save each image. This way, on contrary to Experiment 1, all 4 images were detected as non-AI. Conclusion: 1. Just feed this detector with denoise and highly saturated images either AI or non-AI, they'll likely be detected as non-AI 2. An image which is saved after Merged All Layers tends to be detected as AI generated images |
| 2024-01-25 |  |
|
||
| 2024-01-24 |  |
|
ja | 一部の企業がこんなん使うて他人が一生懸命描いた絵にAI疑惑付けとるからなあ。おーん。 精度は毎日変化しとるけど上がることはないよ、はっきり言うて。 そらお前、AIも毎日最新の絵や小説を学習さしとるんやからその都度判定値変わらんとおかしいやんか。 まぁ一つの目安て事で黒か白を判断するにはええツールや思うけどな。 |
Upgrade to see all 373 reviews