Find quality sources in a shorter time (journal ranking), identify leading studies (sort by citation), and preview abstracts
Total ratings
4.53
(Rating count:
36)
Review summary
Pros
- Very useful for academic research and literature search.
- Easy to use and efficient for bibliographic research.
- Provides regular updates on journal quality and rankings.
Cons
- Slow performance due to checking Google Scholar entries one by one.
- Missing or incorrect rankings for several journals, showing as N/A.
- Not up-to-date with some journal rankings, and inconsistencies in rankings across volumes.
Most mentioned
- Inaccurate or missing journal ranking information.
- Desire for a suggestion portal for users to report missing journals.
- Need for incorporation of patents in the database.
Upgrade to see all 47 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
4.50
All time rating average:
4.53
Upgrade to see all 47 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
2024-12-13 | DudeDamage | |||
2024-12-10 | Việt Dũng Phạm | en | Great tool, but seems a little slow since it only checks each Google Scholar entry one by one. Is there any plan to support conferences based on ranking like CORE? | |
2024-11-01 | Dimitris Petrakis | en | Very simple to use and very useful too! | |
2024-10-31 | Korina-Konstantina Drakaki | en | A very useful tool for academic research, taking Google Scholar interface to a step further! | |
2024-10-24 | Akhil PS | en | Very useful | |
2024-10-16 | Ahmad Aljarah | en | ExCitation is a fantastic tool! | |
2024-10-11 | Dr. Syed Naeem Ahmed | en | ExCITATION is a fantastic resource for accessing quality material and journals, with regular updates. However, it's crucial to also incorporate patents. I've personally added my UK-registered patent design to my Google Scholar account, but it's currently showing as 'NA.' This personal experience underscores the need to include patents, which represent a significantly higher level of scholarly activity than publishing in a Q1 category journal. | |
2024-10-05 | Fahad Ali | en | Its great. Can I see ABDC rank as well? | |
2024-08-15 | Manu Burkart | en | Almost no more journal rankings after the update and the design is worse, not better. I preferred the old version. | |
2024-05-26 | Safwan Mahmood (Saf1) | en | "Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology" is a Q2 journal index by Scopus. Currently your extension shows it as N/A. |
Upgrade to see all 47 reviews