Kingsquare HTML Validator
A HTML5 validation library, using a JavaScript port of the excellent TIDY library
Total ratings
2.86
(Rating count:
36)Review summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated. Pros
- Incorporated into developer tools
- Works offline
- Provides validation by line number
- Great for error messages
- Useful for identifying errors
Cons
- Output format is not user-friendly
- False warnings and spurious errors
- Does not handle UTF-8 encoded characters well
- Requires reloads to validate local files
- Needs improvement in error messages
Most mentioned
- False warnings and spurious errors
- Output format is horrible
- Incorporated into developer tools
- Requires reload to validate
- Needs more context in warnings and errors
Upgrade to see all 38 reviews
Recent reviews
Recent rating average:
2.40
All time rating average:
2.86
Upgrade to see all 38 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-28 | Patrick Gallagher | | Might like it if I could get it to do something. Does not seem to check anything. | |
| 2019-02-28 |  | | en | Might like it if I could get it to do something. Does not seem to check anything. |
| 2017-11-27 |  | | Why does this module not qualified the display video's at the nu.nl? | |
| 2017-11-27 |  | | en | Why does this module not qualified the display video's at the nu.nl? |
| 2016-06-23 |  | | too finicky Should just show errors | |
| 2016-06-23 |  | | en | too finicky Should just show errors |
| 2015-10-28 |  | | Good plugin, but the output format is **horrible**... | |
| 2015-10-29 |  | | en | Good plugin, but the output format is **horrible**... |
| 2015-10-15 |  | | Tried this on a site that passed the W3C validator and got spurious warnings (e.g. no DOCTYPE even though DOCTYPE existed, warnings about leftmargin on <body> when there was no such atribute). Also does not work on AJAX sites as far as I could see. Final nail is that if developer tools were not already open, requires a reload to validate. | |
| 2015-10-15 |  | | en | Tried this on a site that passed the W3C validator and got spurious warnings (e.g. no DOCTYPE even though DOCTYPE existed, warnings about leftmargin on <body> when there was no such atribute). Also does not work on AJAX sites as far as I could see. Final nail is that if developer tools were not already open, requires a reload to validate. |
Upgrade to see all 38 reviews