Chrome-Stats extension
No-Script Suite Lite
Blocks scripts (and more) on untrusted websites.
Total ratings for No-Script Suite Lite
3.56
(Rating count:
179)
User reviews summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Chrome Web Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated.
Pros
- Effective at blocking unwanted or dangerous elements from running on sites
- Simple and easy to use interface
- Adds a ton of security for blocking scripts and web elements
- Helps block scripts that other plugins may not be able to
Cons
- Does not work well with sites that put a username in front of the domain
- No way to export/import settings
- Does not have a wildcard feature for whitelisting subdomains
- Not user friendly for some users
Most mentioned
- Effective at blocking unwanted or dangerous elements from running on sites
- Does not work well with sites that put a username in front of the domain
- Simple and easy to use interface
- Not user friendly for some users
- No way to export/import settings
Upgrade to see all 83 reviews
Recent reviews for No-Script Suite Lite
Recent rating average:
2.80
All time rating average:
3.56
Upgrade to see all 83 reviews
Rating filters
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Lang | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-20 |  |
|
en | helps me block scripts that ghostery or other plugins are not able to |
| 2024-01-06 |  |
|
en | After using "No-Script" on Mozilla by Giorgio Maone all your script blockers seem so complicated. His just blocks dumb @$$ scripts and allows you to whitelist them or temporarily whilelist them as the appear in order: meaning if I'm watching a youtube movie, facebook is already blocked. |
| 2023-11-06 |  |
|
Męczarnia. Nie wiem nawet czy działa. Problem polega na tym, że żeby strona działała musisz dodać do białej listy. Jak dodasz do białej listy to przecież nie blokuje. Jak blokuje to nie możesz używać strony. I to jest ten problem. Nie da się używać przeglądarki z tym dodatkiem. | |
| 2023-11-06 |  |
|
pl | Męczarnia. Nie wiem nawet czy działa. Problem polega na tym, że żeby strona działała musisz dodać do białej listy. Jak dodasz do białej listy to przecież nie blokuje. Jak blokuje to nie możesz używać strony. I to jest ten problem. Nie da się używać przeglądarki z tym dodatkiem. |
| 2023-02-19 |  |
|
What a nonsense. Fake. The interface is not user friendly at all. The interface does not show the processes that this extension runs on the open site. What does this extension do? Looks like no good. I removed it in the end. The extension with this name, in the Firefox browser, is much better. | |
| 2022-09-03 |  |
|
I have been using this extension for as long as I can remember. It adds a ton of security for blocking scripts and web elements. easy to change security modes depending on needs. | |
| 2022-05-05 |  |
|
Simples, prático e funcional. | |
| 2021-10-11 |  |
|
May 2021: I cannot edit the whitelist, except adding. I cannot convert to exclusive mode, or the exclusive mode block nothing. ... But the extensive run smooth in general. Oct 2021: After a few update, now it cannot run when I start chrome, I need to disable and enable to wake it up. | |
| 2021-10-06 | |
|
its the year 2021 and this so called "developer" doesnt even know about wildcards. Today almost all sites use sub domains so you literally have to approve each subdomain instead of just using a * wildcard to specify all sub domains. Also, has this dev heard about alphabetical order so we can actually see what domains have been approved and it also makes it like 1000000 times easier to revoke a domains approval. But who thinks about all this complicated stuff when developing a addon? | |
| 2021-08-30 |  |
|
It's very effective at blocking unwanted or dangerous stuff from running on sites you go to. Just whitelist the site you're on if it's something you use often and know is safe. However, it doesn't work well at all with sites that put a username in front of the domain. Bandcamp and Itch.io are two examples. For instance, www.bandname1.bandcamp.com and www.bandname2.bandcamp.com would have to be added separately. So every single band at Bandcamp has to be whitelisted individually, you can't just whitelist a site like Bandcamp once and be done with it. Any site which puts a username in front of the domain has this problem, and it's the most frustrating thing about the extension if you happen to use any sites which do that. Otherwise this would have been a 5 star review. I even tried contacting the developer about this some time ago but never got a response. What makes it worse is that every single other security focused extension I have used, except for this one, makes it easy to whitelist an entire site domain even if the site puts a username in front of the domain. It's ONLY this one that can't let you whitelist all of a site like of Bandcamp or Itch.io with just one click. Only this one. It also doesn't seem to have any way to export/import settings at all, which is what prompted this review. I was going to recommend this extension to someone who doesn't use Bandcamp or Itch.io, and export my over 3000 long whitelist so they could use it. But there's no export/import anywhere that I can see. There's no way I'd want them to go through the trouble of adding all those themselves, like I did slowly over years, so I guess I won't be recommending it to them after all. Honestly if I had known about the username.domain issue before I had a very sizable whitelist already, I would never have started using this in the first place. |
Upgrade to see all 83 reviews