# Wikipedia First

> Reorders Google and DuckDuckGo search results so Wikipedia is on top.

Canonical page: [https://chrome-stats.com/d/wikipedia-first](https://chrome-stats.com/d/wikipedia-first)

## Overview

- **ID:** `wikipedia-first`
- **Platform:** Firefox
- **Type:** Firefox add-on
- **Status:** Available
- **Publisher:** mazza
- **Category:** search-tools
- **Daily users:** 135
- **Weekly downloads:** 5
- **Rating:** 5.00 / 5 (7 ratings)
- **Version:** 1.0
- **Last updated:** 2024-02-07
- **First published:** 2024-02-06
- **Size:** 10 KB
- **Data as of:** 2026-09-14
- **Store listing:** [Firefox Add-ons Store](https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/wikipedia-first/)
- **Website:** [https://github.com/itsjustmustafa/reorder\_google\_results\_extension](https://github.com/itsjustmustafa/reorder_google_results_extension)

## Description

Places the Wikipedia link at the top of the search results of Google and DuckDuckGo, if its available on the first page.

Enshittification: The decay of a digital platform, coined by Cory Doctorow <a href="https://prod.outgoing.prod.webservices.mozgcp.net/v1/39838f87363fae4e272879408ff61e44d03ab777b6f5055ac3c9060abcae3c14/https%3A//www.wired.com/story/tiktok-platforms-cory-doctorow/" rel="nofollow">https://www.wired.com/story/tiktok-platforms-cory-doctorow/</a>

&gt; Even with that foundational understanding of enshittification, Google has been unable to resist its siren song. Today's Google results are an increasingly useless morass of self-preferencing links to its own products, ads for products that aren't good enough to float to the top of the list on its own, and parasitic SEO junk piggybacking on the former.

## Rankings

- #10,166 — Overall
- #17 — wikipedia
- #102 — wiki
- #135 — result
- #166 — increase
- #178 — tiktok

## Permissions and access

### Content script matches

- `*.google.com`
- `duckduckgo.com`

## Safety

- **Risk impact:** High risk impact
- **Risk likelihood:** Low risk likelihood

### Analysis details

- Request access to the following domains: google.com, duckduckgo.com
- This extension has low user count. Unpopular extensions may not be stable or safe.

> Some risk analysis details are omitted from this free response. [Upgrade to view the full analysis](https://chrome-stats.com/pricing).

## Similar extensions and apps

- [DuckDuckGo Wikipedia](https://chrome-stats.com/d/duckduckgo-wikipedia) — 12 users
- [WIKI 2. Wikipedia Republished](https://chrome-stats.com/d/wikipedia-advanced) — 83 users, 4.14 / 5
- [Grokipedia vs Wikipedia Diff](https://chrome-stats.com/d/grokipedia-vs-wikipedia-diff) — 6 users, 5.00 / 5
- [Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized](https://chrome-stats.com/d/wikiwand-wikipedia-modernized) — 7,666 users, 3.78 / 5
- [Search Enhancement](https://chrome-stats.com/d/search-enhancement) — 3 users
- [Better Search for Google](https://chrome-stats.com/d/better-search-for-google) — 1 users
- [Gizoogle](https://chrome-stats.com/d/gizoogle) — 63 users, 5.00 / 5
- [Hide w3schools on DuckDuckGo](https://chrome-stats.com/d/hide-w3schools-on-duckduckgo) — 39 users, 5.00 / 5
- [Google Search Plus](https://chrome-stats.com/d/g-search-plus) — 154 users, 4.73 / 5
- [DuckDuckGo Top Result](https://chrome-stats.com/d/duckduckgo-top-result) — 12 users, 1.00 / 5
- [Wikipedia to Google Images New](https://chrome-stats.com/d/wikipedia-to-google-images-new) — 1 users
- [Discontent](https://chrome-stats.com/d/discontent) — 13 users

---

Source: [Chrome-Stats](https://chrome-stats.com/d/wikipedia-first)