# Grand Canyon National Park

> Grand Canyon Visitor Guide

Canonical page: [https://chrome-stats.com/d/id974662154](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id974662154)

## Overview

- **ID:** `id974662154`
- **Platform:** Apple
- **Type:** Apple app
- **Status:** Available
- **Publisher:** Nicolas Juarez
- **Category:** Education
- **Rating:** 4.70 / 5 (247 ratings)
- **Version:** 1.0.18
- **Last updated:** 2026-01-26
- **First published:** 2015-03-21
- **Size:** 75 MB
- **Data as of:** 2026-09-23
- **Store listing:** [Apple App Store](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/grand-canyon-national-park/id974662154)
- **Privacy policy:** [http://etips.com/privacy-policy](http://etips.com/privacy-policy)

## Description

Thousands of travelers rely on Grand Canyon National Park Offline Visitor Guide for a 100% offline mobile guide. It includes five offline maps: Route map, Village and Hermit Road, Desert View Drive, Grand Canyon general map, and Hiking trails map, along with history, biology and ecology, and practical touristic information.

Built from traveler experiences—covering Native American, Spanish, and American explorations—this guide lets you explore the park offline, access routes and landmarks, and gain cultural context without internet. Take it on your trip to the South Rim and beyond to discover everything the Grand Canyon has to offer.

## Rankings

- #96,012 — Overall

## Review summary

Reviewers overwhelmingly criticize the app for deceptive marketing and poor value. The paywall to access maps and deeper content, along with inaccurate or minimal content (including misused photos and simplistic geology text), and readability issues, are the main complaints. A minority note good photo quality and some trip-use, but the consensus is that the app offers little practical guidance for visitors and feels dominated by ads and promotions rather than a useful guide.

### Pros

- Beautiful photos/images of the Grand Canyon.
- Some reviewers found the guide useful for identifying places to visit and for basic planning (maps/circuits).
- A few users enjoyed using it during their trip and appreciated the visuals.

### Cons

- Requires an in-app upgrade to access maps and full features, with many reviewers calling it deceptive.
- Content quality issues: photos used are sometimes from other parks, and geology/geography text is oversimplified or inaccurate, with typos.
- Very limited content for visitors (no trails, few practical details) and claims to offer information that can be found for free elsewhere.
- Readability and usability problems: font size is too small and color makes text hard to read.
- Promotional elements and hotel ads create a scammy impression and contribute to misrepresentation.

## Similar extensions and apps

- [Glacier National Park](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1068192106) — 4.70 / 5
- [Yellowstone National Park](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1047797114) — 4.80 / 5
- [Chichen Itza Travel Guide](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id985182855) — 1.00 / 5
- [Holy Land Visitor Guide](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1135444586) — 1.80 / 5
- [Tate Modern Visitor Guide](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1146512635) — 4.00 / 5
- [Grand Canyon Offline Guide](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1637092145) — 5.00 / 5
- [Tulum Travel Guide Offline](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id994552332) — 1.00 / 5
- [Tate Britain Visitor Guide](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1144273714) — 1.00 / 5
- [Yosemite National Park](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1047718432) — 4.50 / 5
- [Great Smoky Mountains Nat Park](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1046486484) — 4.80 / 5
- [Park Güell Visitor Guide](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1171253584) — 1.00 / 5
- [National Gallery of Art](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1046851122) — 1.10 / 5

---

Source: [Chrome-Stats](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id974662154)