# 1967: Retro Filters & Effects

> Vintage Camera + Photo Editor

Canonical page: [https://chrome-stats.com/d/id916195181](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id916195181)

## Overview

- **ID:** `id916195181`
- **Platform:** Apple
- **Type:** Apple app
- **Status:** Available
- **Publisher:** Maple Media Apps, LLC
- **Category:** Photo & Video
- **Rating:** 4.50 / 5 (33,581 ratings)
- **Version:** 2.4.0
- **Last updated:** 2026-08-09
- **First published:** 2014-09-18
- **Size:** 210 MB
- **Data as of:** 2026-09-19
- **Store listing:** [Apple App Store](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/1967-retro-filters-effects/id916195181)
- **Website:** [https://maplemedia.io/](https://maplemedia.io/)
- **Privacy policy:** [https://maplemedia.io/privacy/](https://maplemedia.io/privacy/)

## Description

1967: Retro Filters & Effects recreates the look of classic film with authentic tones, grain, light leaks, and scratches. With over 200 retro filters and more than 50 effects per pack, editing is fast: a tap cycles variations, and sliders adjust opacity and texture to dial in the vintage vibe. Collections include Burn Films, Color Lights, Bokeh, Rainbow, Sun Leaks, Duotone, and the 1967 Original set, plus additional packs for more options.

This Chrome extension version emphasizes quick, beginner-friendly editing to transform photos from your gallery into 1960s-inspired images. It offers one-tap previews, simple color presets, and premium collections for extended editing. Subscriptions are available (Unlimited Access) with standard renewal terms; view the Terms of Service for details.

## Rankings

- #8,553 — Overall
- #32 — effect

## Review summary

Users frequently report that saving photos after applying filters results in blur or artifacts, while the app bombards users with ads and paid features. Additional recurring issues include loss of access to purchased filters after updates, poor support and refund handling, crashes during save, and intrusive age-verification requirements. A few users note the filters can be appealing when working, but reliability and monetization problems dominate overall feedback.

### Cons

- Images become blurred or distorted after editing or saving (fisheye effect, edges blur, or other artifacts).
- Excessive ads and monetization; even among paid users, ads persist and many filters require extra payments.
- Purchased filters can become inaccessible after updates; customer support is slow or unresponsive and refunds are unclear.
- App crashes or freezes when saving a photo or applying filters.
- Age verification/privacy gating (birthdate requirement) blocks access for some users and feels intrusive.

## Similar extensions and apps

- [Vintage Camera: Retro Filter](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6748570762) — 5.00 / 5
- [Vintage Camera ~ AI Retro Cam](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6748669487) — 5.00 / 5
- [1970 Cam – Vintage Film Camera](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6780858057)
- [Light Leak Cam - Retro Filters](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6747018085) — 5.00 / 5
- [1980s-Retro](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6505014197)
- [Retro Camera 1999 - Filters](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6743980634) — 2.00 / 5
- [RetroCam : Live Vintage Camera](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id715504622) — 5.00 / 5
- [RetroCam: Vintage Film Camera](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id298796414) — 4.70 / 5
- [Flux Cam - Vintage Camera](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6741779902)
- [Film Vintage Camera: Retro Cam](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6756916504) — 1.00 / 5
- [Retroscope - Retro Filters](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1619085683) — 2.50 / 5
- [Ṿintage Camera](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1538095595) — 3.00 / 5

---

Source: [Chrome-Stats](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id916195181)