# Fulcrum GIS field data capture

> Mobile app with built-in GIS

Canonical page: [https://chrome-stats.com/d/id467758260](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id467758260)

## Overview

- **ID:** `id467758260`
- **Platform:** Apple
- **Type:** Apple app
- **Status:** Available
- **Publisher:** Spatial Networks, Inc
- **Category:** Business
- **Rating:** 4.00 / 5 (112 ratings)
- **Version:** 2609.1.0
- **Last updated:** 2026-09-16
- **First published:** 2011-10-07
- **Size:** 237 MB
- **Data as of:** 2026-09-19
- **Store listing:** [Apple App Store](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/fulcrum-gis-field-data-capture/id467758260)
- **Website:** [https://www.fulcrumapp.com](https://www.fulcrumapp.com/)
- **Privacy policy:** [https://www.fulcrumapp.com/privacy/](https://www.fulcrumapp.com/privacy/)

## Description

Fulcrum GIS field data capture is a field-first mobile GIS platform designed to boost field operations with AI-powered data entry, offline capture, real-time sync, and easy geospatial data collection. It enables both GIS experts and non-GIS teams to capture and share geospatial data using intuitive forms, GPS-based workflows, and tight Esri ArcGIS integration.

Key capabilities include a drag-and-drop form builder, AI-powered voice data entry, offline data collection with sync, GeoJSON or Shapefile exports, SOC 2 Type 2 security, SSO, and native iOS apps—empowering field teams across construction, utilities, and environmental services to improve data accuracy and automate workflows.

## Rankings

- #137,059 — Overall
- #61 — data

## Review summary

Fulcrum is praised for ease of use, offline field usability, customizable forms, and strong website integration with multi-user syncing and robust reporting. Recurrent downsides are stability issues (crashes during sync and freezes), rising pricing and billing problems, and unfavorable UI/update changes. Some users also report post-update performance regressions and difficulty reverting versions. Overall, it’s powerful when stable, but reliability and cost are the main concerns.

### Pros

- Easy to use with highly customizable data collection forms, reducing double-entry and saving time.
- Works well in the field and offline, with hands-free operation and simple photo uploads.
- Strong data integration across the website with multi-user syncing and clear decision-support via reports/BI.
- Supports customizable reporting (PDFs) and flexible field data capture for client work.
- Good support and admin-friendly deployment that enables rapid, global deployment.

### Cons

- Frequent crashes and instability, especially during sync, leading to potential data loss.
- Pricing increases and billing issues including erroneous charges and poor support.
- UI/UX changes are harder to read and include smaller sync controls, with some users preferring the old interface and noting update-related regressions.
- Persistent performance issues after updates and difficulties reverting to older versions.

## Similar extensions and apps

- [Fulcrum for Intune](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6754570882)
- [FulcrumHQ Field](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1437114075) — 5.00 / 5
- [Felt: Field App, Maps, GIS](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6754033379) — 5.00 / 5
- [Fulcrum Mobility+](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1375703415) — 1.70 / 5
- [Geofield Cloud](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6748637679) — 5.00 / 5
- [Fielda](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1471791163) — 4.40 / 5
- [Mobile Data Collection](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id640535923) — 4.80 / 5
- [TerraFlex](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id657628979) — 2.40 / 5
- [Fulcrum App](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6449279963)
- [FlowGIS Mobile](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1447533715) — 3.50 / 5
- [GeoCollect: GIS & Field Maps](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6450780431) — 5.00 / 5
- [GeoField Data](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6793334754) — 5.00 / 5

---

Source: [Chrome-Stats](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id467758260)