# Driver4VR: Full Body Tracking

> FBT in VRChat with easy setup

Canonical page: [https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1670086743](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1670086743)

## Overview

- **ID:** `id1670086743`
- **Platform:** Apple
- **Type:** Apple app
- **Status:** Available
- **Publisher:** Grzegorz Bednarski
- **Category:** Entertainment
- **Rating:** 3.50 / 5 (454 ratings)
- **Version:** 0.51
- **Last updated:** 2026-04-09
- **First published:** 2023-03-28
- **Size:** 159 MB
- **Data as of:** 2026-09-25
- **Store listing:** [Apple App Store](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/driver4vr-full-body-tracking/id1670086743)
- **Privacy policy:** [https://www.driver4vr.com/privacy-policy/](https://www.driver4vr.com/privacy-policy/)

## Description

Driver4VR: **Full Body Tracking** uses deep learning to determine your body's position and streams motion data over your local network to VRChat on Quest/PC. It supports front or rear cameras, requires no extra apps or drivers, and offers a fast, simple setup so you can start tracking your hips, knees, and more right away.

Highlights include an auto-scan for quicker config, a global Discord community, and a premium '**pay once, use forever**' option. This page explains how to configure, calibrate, and begin using Driver4VR to create more immersive VRChat experiences with full-body motion.

## Rankings

- #84,909 — Overall

## Review summary

Driver4VR is a cheap, potentially convenient option for full-body tracking with smooth performance when it works. Its appeal lies in value for money and straightforward setup for some users. However, it suffers from recurring connectivity issues (IP/OSC), tracking glitches, and a paywall for full functionality, plus UI bugs and setup complexity that frustrate others. Overall, it's affordable but reliability and ease of use vary widely across reviews.

### Pros

- Very affordable price for full-body tracking; great value for money.
- When it works, tracking is smooth with low latency.
- Setup can be straightforward enough to achieve full-body tracking.
- Camera-based tracking quality is decent and can outperform some alternatives.
- Some users find it smoother than Viso and appreciate the overall value.

### Cons

- Frequent IP/OSC connectivity issues; requires correct IP/OSC setup and VRChat configuration, often with no connection.
- Tracking can be glitchy and inaccurate (chest twitch, legs swapped, hip swing too strong, jankiness in VRChat).
- Free version is limited to about 15 minutes of full-body tracking; full features require payment.
- UI/UX bugs and lag; occasional device selection issues and reliability concerns.
- Security/perception concerns about needing IPs/ports and the associated setup complexity.

## Similar extensions and apps

- [Viso FBT](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6445987497) — 3.60 / 5
- [CamTra](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6755438477) — 2.50 / 5
- [PinoFBT](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6444877037) — 3.60 / 5
- [Body Trackor VRChat and vTuber](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1527542773) — 2.70 / 5
- [PinoFBT 2.0](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6778654094) — 4.70 / 5
- [VRStep](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6464096715) — 2.30 / 5
- [VRChat](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6448578770) — 4.40 / 5
- [OwOTrack](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1563711037) — 4.10 / 5
- [vear - Anime Avatar Camera](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1490697369) — 4.50 / 5
- [TDPT](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1561086509) — 2.80 / 5
- [6D Tracker](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1664972512) — 3.50 / 5
- [TrackBridge: Head Tracking](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6781992073) — 5.00 / 5

---

Source: [Chrome-Stats](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1670086743)