# Bricksee

> AI Brick Catalogue

Canonical page: [https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1531247091](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1531247091)

## Overview

- **ID:** `id1531247091`
- **Platform:** Apple
- **Type:** Apple app
- **Status:** Available
- **Publisher:** Harry Jeffs
- **Category:** Utilities
- **Rating:** 3.90 / 5 (72 ratings)
- **Version:** 5.3
- **Last updated:** 2026-09-16
- **First published:** 2022-12-29
- **Size:** 75 MB
- **Data as of:** 2026-09-21
- **Store listing:** [Apple App Store](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/bricksee/id1531247091)
- **Website:** [https://www.bricksee.app](https://www.bricksee.app/)
- **Privacy policy:** [https://bricksee.app/privacy-policy](https://bricksee.app/privacy-policy)

## Description

Bricksee is your AI-powered LEGO organizer that helps you track builds, access high-quality instructions, and manage a catalog of 10k+ sets on-device.

Features include weekly updates on new sets, a shareable wishlist, achievements and a leaderboard to spark friendly competition, and an on-device AI assistant for all things LEGO, while keeping your data private. This indie project is not affiliated with LEGO.

## Rankings

- #162,930 — Overall

## Review summary

Bricksee’s reviews show poor reliability: it often misidentifies bricks and colors, delivers inconsistent scan results, and suffers from bugs that can wipe progress. Pricing and subscriptions are criticized as hidden or expensive, with users preferring Brickit or even Google. A few call out a decent interface and potential, but reliability and cost are the main obstacles.

### Pros

- Potential to identify parts and build a digital inventory when it works.
- Nice overall interface / user experience.
- The concept could be a strong tool for rebuilding Lego sets if reliability improves.

### Cons

- Highly inaccurate identification of bricks, colors, and piece counts; results are inconsistent across scans.
- Frequent bugs and reliability issues, including progress loss and limited functionality (e.g., cannot delete or edit after scanning).
- Payment/subscription concerns: paywalls, subscriptions without explicit permission, and perceived high costs.
- Competitors (Brickit, Google) often perform better, according to users.
- Specific misidentifications (e.g., white bricks identified as green; 2x12 misidentified as bat wing) show flaws in color/part recognition.

## Similar extensions and apps

- [Brick by Brick for LEGO sets](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id525328219) — 4.60 / 5
- [BrickPal](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6794461062) — 5.00 / 5
- [BrickFinder Companion](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6775367988) — 4.70 / 5
- [Brckly](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6755550724) — 5.00 / 5
- [BrickKeep](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6785500953)
- [brickd](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6477047286) — 4.90 / 5
- [Brickstack](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6764305692)
- [BrickDisplay](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6756432334)
- [Brick Shelf](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6752793786)
- [Chamber of Bricks](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6761167416)
- [Baseplate Brick Catalog](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6737250348) — 5.00 / 5
- [BrickTrack](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1619644538) — 5.00 / 5

---

Source: [Chrome-Stats](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1531247091)