# Calorie counter - Scanfood

> Diet Tracker and Food scanner

Canonical page: [https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1497144942](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1497144942)

## Overview

- **ID:** `id1497144942`
- **Platform:** Apple
- **Type:** Apple app
- **Status:** Available
- **Publisher:** Have a nice day
- **Category:** Food & Drink
- **Rating:** 4.00 / 5 (125 ratings)
- **Version:** 2.20
- **Last updated:** 2026-08-12
- **First published:** 2020-02-07
- **Size:** 53 MB
- **Data as of:** 2026-09-04
- **Store listing:** [Apple App Store](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/calorie-counter-scanfood/id1497144942)
- **Website:** [https://appscanfood.com/](https://appscanfood.com/)
- **Privacy policy:** [https://appscanfood.com/policy.html](https://appscanfood.com/policy.html)

## Description

ScanFood is an AI-powered nutrition tracker that helps you reach your goals by turning photos of meals into precise nutrition data. It makes calorie tracking fast and convenient, calculating calories, proteins, fats, and carbohydrates from your meals.

Key features include AI-based calorie recognition, barcode scanning for detailed nutrition information, portion weight input, and the ability to add new products. It also syncs with Apple Fitness, offers personalized recommendations and reminders, and supports flexible goals with subscription options.

## Rankings

- #131,275 — Overall

## Review summary

Users praise the app's clean, easy-to-use interface and barcode/calorie features, but report significant reliability issues. Calorie data is often inaccurate, barcode scanning fails, and manual entry is cumbersome with odd default portions and no meal-saving. Workout calories tracking is flaky, sometimes showing zero. Some features may require a subscription. In short, data accuracy, barcode support, and smoother input are needed for the app to deliver on its potential.

### Pros

- Nicely laid out and easy to use
- Barcode scanner is efficient
- Calorie counter helps with accountability

### Cons

- Calorie data is inaccurate or unreliable; requires constant verification
- Barcode scanning often fails and the barcode database is limited
- Manual data entry is tedious due to limited database and non-standard portion sizes; meals aren’t saved for later
- Workout calories tracking is not working properly (calories burned show as 0 or misattributed)

## Similar extensions and apps

- [Food Scan - AI Calorie Counter](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6740452900) — 4.60 / 5
- [Calories Scan: Food & Tracker](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6757302476)
- [ScanCalorie: Calorie Counter](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6747888625) — 4.60 / 5
- [AI Calorie Tracker - Food Scan](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6745053985) — 3.50 / 5
- [CalScan - AI Calorie Tracker](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6502774426) — 4.80 / 5
- [FoodScan AI: Calorie Counter](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6764772440)
- [Food Scanner - Calorie Counter](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6747472011)
- [CalScanner: AI Food Scanner](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6761003895) — 4.10 / 5
- [CalScan AI - Calorie Tracker](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6746515780) — 4.80 / 5
- [AI Calorie Tracker - Scan Food](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6753807991) — 5.00 / 5
- [MealScan - Calorie Tracker](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6751718000) — 4.90 / 5
- [EatScan - AI Calorie Tracker](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id6749400841)

---

Source: [Chrome-Stats](https://chrome-stats.com/d/id1497144942)